View Single Post
Old 02-02-10, 01:17 AM   #32
goldorak
Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,320
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by August View Post
Actually this illustrates my point quite nicely. The goal of the Apollo program was never about space colonization, it was to get to the moon. An effort akin to being first to climb a mountain, we did it because it was there. Once that goal was achieved support for this politically driven effort faded.

Do you realise that by making this argument you're basically agreeing with me when I say that the legacy of Apollo is nonexistant.
And we are back to square 1 ? We have squandered 40 years doing nothing but handing over cash for failed projects that didn't have any long term goals.

Quote:
How do you expect to come up with long term taxpayer support if you have no clear vision, and how can you have a clear vision if you can't even define the reason for being up there? It's like packing for a trip without knowing your destination.
Oh please, nobody is advocating giving NASA a free ride or even 10% of the GDP over the next 50 years.
You can have a clear long term vision. Von Braun had one, and it made sense.
It was sidestepped for a "p i s s i n g" contest with the soviets.
And in the end besides the nice american flag on the moon everything else was wasted. Never underestimate the idocy of policy makers.


Quote:
I agree. I understand there are also rather severe regulatory restrictions on private space ventures, especially manned ones.
As it should be.
goldorak is offline   Reply With Quote