[Skybird]

It's a decade-old conflict between two camps, one wanting cooperation of sovereign nations - not more, and one wanting to destroy sovereignity of nations for the sake of centralising power in one neo-feudal government in Brussel that must not really seek legitimation by European citizens anymore (the commission already is not elected by the citizens but gets negotiated by heads of states behind closed doors, nor are the EU Court's judges - both institutions have, like the EU parliament which is a collections of personal curious, a strong self interest to widen their powers and to destroy the sovereignity of indeed elected governments in the national states).

The camp choosing this neo-feudal structure of a European superstate, since 10-15 years, sometime after the fall of the iron curtain, has been on a decisive offensive. I think they cannot be stopped anymore without violence. Therefore, i accept the option of violence since quite some time now. These people have done an incredible, most dangerous ammount of damage already, and they must be stopped, at all cost. Even if that means burning streets in european metropoles and cities, and storming of parliaments and revolutionary court martials. Stopping them is the priority objective, and shattering the economical lobby that has formed and amassed and infests policy-makers like a bone cancer and ridicule national elections even more by rendering the choice of the people meaningless by waving with a handful of dollar- and euro- notes. Using as little violence as possible in getting rid of the EU is only of secondary interest. If it can be done without it - nice. If not, then go the hard way. But stopping them we must. The EU already is the greatest danger to the European idea.

We have had already two centralised tyrannies too much in Germany. I do not need a third one, now covering all of Europe and supressing the European people once again - this time not with bajonets, but with a totalitarian bureaucracy and overboarding laws and a caste of office workers who execute governmental powers without ever having been democratically legitimised by the european citizens, and are free to act woth9ut ever needing to fear to be held personally responsible.

That I would one day sound like this, just years ago I would not have imagined possible. But it is the failure of political establishments on national levels and their ongoing display of utmost disrespect for the opinion of the people, both regarding the EU tyranny and the islamisation of Europe, that drives more and more once moderate people like me towards desperate positions where they accept even radical and even extremeist positions - in a case of self defence, since neither reasonable argument nor moderate convictions do achieve anything anymore. In the past two years or so I dound out to my great surprise that most of the friends of my parents, all of them being anothe rgeneration than I am obviously, also have shifted away from the established political common grpunds, and have become radicalised. I see it also happening among my own freinds, though at a slower pace, but it happens.

And wise men like Roman Herzog are aware of it, and feel the changing mood. what I say above is exactly what Herzog warns of, and warns of not for the first time. evben Giscard-d'Estaing and Helmut Schmidt both gave assessements of that EU being on so wrong a path that both man said they think the chances for the EU collapsing are greater now than the chnaces that the EU could survive. and the gave the same reasons again: lacking acceptance, overregulation, absolutistic arrogance, illusory migration policies, failed integration.

Nobody in europe should know it better than us Germans - we have been there, twice, within just the past 3 generations. It seems the young do not learn from it, and the old do no remember anymore, or are gone. And so the same mistakes get made again.

Once could become depressed from thinking about the hopeless message this holds for man's future intellectual evolution.