[Skybird]

"Therefore, legislation should prohibit discrimination based on religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation in a range of areas outsidethe labour market, including social protection, education and access to and supply of goods and services, including housing."

You obviously are not aware of the dodges and tricks of advocates. It is vague and open forumlöations like "in a range of areas outside x, y, z" that opens door, window and gate for charges outside the objects of "labour market, including social protection, education and access to and supply of goods and services, including housing."

There is plenty of critcism of these laws, that you can find easily - if only you would want. critcism from law experts themselves, btw, whose hints at crticial imp0lications I trust morer than your detemrination to just understand it as superficial as the ink on the surface of the paper. It works the same way here like the Lisbon dictate, which on the surface reads all nice and well - and has all the critical stuff hidden in implications the layman does not easily recognise, and in complex appendices that several dozen times the volume than the original document.

I already corrected myself, I tend to mix mistake a directive draft with that directive already having passed the minister council, but when this directive has passed the ministre council this year, Britain is obligated to turn it into mandatory law, with all it's details and demands - there is no no escape. And then you can be sued for any comment you make that somebody else claims is hurting his religious feelings. And YOU have to bring the eviodence that it is not. The other does not have to prove his claim.

You better believe it, Letum, even if I do not take the time to drown you in a series of links.