Quote:
Originally Posted by Lt.Fillipidis
150km South East of Kursk, 2 days before the Battle of Kursk.
Here are a few links. They dont mentrion the bombing of Kursk itself though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitlers_Bombe
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4348497.stm
And here's a YouTube Video that has some pictures of the epicenter.
The only part im sure that its missunderstood its the V2/A-something, which was infact a simple V2 with a range extention (the A-something lower part of the rocket which was similar to what Space Busses use today.)
Nazi Germany evolved as none else did back then. When they lost the war, many patterns and schematics that were captured were still advanced compared to what the allies had. A reason to seize them.
And then, there's the cold war. A reason to hide them.
In a race for power between the Soviet Union and USA, its vital to keep all you can classified. Even things that they discovered years ago.
If the base is provided and you have the knowledge to use it, you're bound to discover whatever you want.
I dont know what you think, but i dont think that the scientists all over the world have discovered so few in so many years with so much knowledge provided. I think they're just classified. |
That book supposedly implies that the bomb was tested in 1944-1945, but the Battle of Kursk was a year earlier, thus contradicting your claims.
The photo of this supposed Kursk explosion is not very convincing, it in fact looks very much like any other similar battlefield after a flash barrage. Many photos of the Western Front in World War I give a similar impression.
I'd still like to see a source for the supposed nuking at Kursk.