SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

Skybird · 12-08-09, 07:30 AM

I have had an Airbus A320 for FS2002, by PSS. but it was simplified and some minor bugs there were, too. Didn't use it often, since superior packages were available, with other planes.

If you want a "realistic" complex cockpit environment, try the

PMDG 747
http://www.avsim.com/pages/0805/pmdg...47_review.html

or the Level-D 767
http://www.avsim.com/pages/0505/lvld_767/lds767.html

or the Flight-1 ATR-72-500.
(cannot be linked, find the reviews yourself in the Avsim review archive, under A (ATR...)

All of them have been redone and released as dedicated FSX packages, too. the FS9-versions all won maximum points and maximum scores around the comnunity's websites.

For small though complex planes , watch out for the Piper Cheyenne by Digital Integration.

12-08-09, 07:30 AM	#4
Skybird Soaring Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: the mental asylum named Germany Posts: 40,643 Downloads: 9 Uploads: 0	I have had an Airbus A320 for FS2002, by PSS. but it was simplified and some minor bugs there were, too. Didn't use it often, since superior packages were available, with other planes. If you want a "realistic" complex cockpit environment, try the PMDG 747 http://www.avsim.com/pages/0805/pmdg...47_review.html or the Level-D 767 http://www.avsim.com/pages/0505/lvld_767/lds767.html or the Flight-1 ATR-72-500. (cannot be linked, find the reviews yourself in the Avsim review archive, under A (ATR...) All of them have been redone and released as dedicated FSX packages, too. the FS9-versions all won maximum points and maximum scores around the comnunity's websites. For small though complex planes , watch out for the Piper Cheyenne by Digital Integration. __________________ If you feel nuts, consult an expert.