[Skybird]

I indeed mixed uzp the ECHR and the ECJ, becasue of the the different names in german and anglish. I meant the ECJ. I stick to my criticism of the ECJ to be extremely in line with the official course of the EU commission. Also that the influence of national governments on both gremiums, is doing great damage to democracy (although here we already seem to agree).

As I repeatedly said, I do not necessarily argue that demcioracy is the best solution always, everywhere, eversytime. But I measure any party claiming to be demcrartic, by it's own claim. And that is why I attack the EU for it'S democratic deficits, that have potenbtially been increased, imo, by the Lisbon dictate.

I think european governments seem to think they are a new feudal elite that tries to rule in an absolutistic manner. That must not be a problem - if the nobleness would be the result of competence and altruism - and selfishness and incompetence and megalomania and narcissism would not be mistaken with nobleness. Indeed I believe that some people can be more noble (important, competent, valuable for the people), than others. Not all people are equal, in no way, sorry. But that status of nobleness is not to be claimed, or bought, or chosen by votes, or won by family heritage, but gets deserved by personal records showing the superior thoughts and deeds.