Quote:
|
@ Tribesman. You don't seem to know when to quit with any grace. I have never seen somebody on any forum get so pounded the way you have, and not know when to put the shovel down.
|
Thats funny , is that a new definition ?
I didn't realise that people having to invent "facts" to support even their most basic claims amounted to me getting pounded.
In case you missed it Haplo was rather foolish and had to edit a definition just so as to be able to claim that his "definition" was correct.
I think that constitutes a flat out lie doesn't it, if he was right in his claims he wouldn't have to lie would he.
Quote:
|
Tribesman - See if you can follow along.
|
I can follow along fine , you were wrong , you were wrong again , you invented "facts", you were wrong ,you made a silly mistake in having to lie to attempt to hide how wrong you were, amd errrrr...you were wrong.
Easy to follow isn't it.
But go on give an honest answer for a change.
Did you really think you could take a cut and paste definition from a government website then alter that definition without anyone noticing?
BTW sea demon, in that report if the efficiency was so bad how is there only a half percent difference?
Actually how does the fact that 10% of the denied Medicare claims are because the people had no Medicare entitlements at all skew the results?
edit to clarify.
Quote:
|
Which - regardless of whether your right or not, makes you LOOK like your talking out your arse. Instead, you want everyone to take everything you say as absolute truth. Life doesn't work that way. Discussions and debates don't either.
|
I see your problem there , I don't want everyone to take everything I say as absolute truth.
That is why I often simply ask questions. That way when people are able to answer the question they can debate properly.
What you appear to do is claim the answer to the question is wrong without even thinking what the question is or establishing what the answer could be.