SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

07-31-05, 03:15 PM

Redstorm you ain't black. How do I know? The best arguments you missed. I purposely placed several points in my postings aimed at discovering such details. I always do. NOT one of your argmuments align with black history. First of all you tried to bring up the FACT that much of the time I talk like a red-neck. But had you been a real darky you would know that Injuns (as a whole) are some of the most red-neck people on earth - and I am not making a funny about the skin color - I mean red neck like most people understand it).

I realize you can't see my skin color, but you can see Sherman Alexie's at: http://www.identitytheory.com/interv...interview.html

and you can read where he states:
"SA: Yeah, the Indian world is incredibly homophobic. It’s so funny, all these white liberals think that Indians are so loving and peaceful and sacred, but you know, Indians are a bunch of rednecks. "

But you see, by his statements and yours we see that you are a WHITE - "white liberals think"...Says Sherman.. and we see you trying to deny I am an Injun cause I often write like a redneck. BUt real Blacks also talk like rednecks - especially among themselves. I don't claim to be an expert about Blacks. I do claim to have called them brothers and Commiserated with them often in the past.

Now the second way and trick I used to determine you were not BLACK. When I first posted the fact of me being an Injun, what I stated was I WAS PART INDIAN. Now, to a white that automatically means I am TOTAL Injun. And the postings of other people right after I posted that IS proof. Everyone suddenly started going on about Native Americans and blah blah blah. Any REAL darky knows JUST how it all works. If I had said I was part Black, everyone would suddenly treat me as a FULL African. Whites don't see anything in between - just WHITE or DARK - gray don't exist to them. And Dark man knows this from tiny childhood. A dark man also knows that dark men can act like rednecks, cowboys, and everything in between. But Whites in America and Europe try to pretend that darkies can ONLY be liberal and left-wing - touchy feely and so forth. To whites Injuns are all mystics - religious shamans - when the truth is Injuns kick dogs, get drunk, and spit on flowers just for the hell of it. WE ARE HUMAN you creep! HUMAN and all that goes with that.

But my point: you read PART INDIAN to mean I had to be FULL INDIAN. Any any event a full blood Indian or a real Black would have caught that point IN AN INSTANT!!!!!! And your main attack on Seaboy should have been: "You aren't qualified to speak cause you are only PART INDIAN." But you missed that point, cause to you only WHITE AND DARK exists - so you saw me trying to be a FULL INDIAN and so you did not use your best attack on me at all - namely that I am only part Indian. You didn't evewn ask HOW MUCH! But like the whites here, you just let it SLIDE. Now Peter, my old Black Panther friend, HE WOULD HAVE CAUGHT THAT POINT INSTANTLY! Cause to dark men there ARE inbetweens - there is MORE than WHITE and DARK. THere are many grays.

Put together, I doubt anything you claim to be. First or last, rather than meeting my arguments - you merely recopy mine - make slight innuendos - like SNICKERS. No your only means of argument is to CALL NAMES. "Troll". Why not just call me an inferior dark man? Calling names like that - with out proof or argument - is no different that racism or prejudging - Prejudice. You couldn't meet my dialog, my thoughts, you could only lash out with a NAME. I find that only people who can't think blurt out 'troll'. Its their pitiful attempt at wiping away a good argument they can't deal with.

DID I begin all this anti-nazi crap about a site some guy just posted so that we could download songs? Did I begin this diatribe about : say you're sorry? No, I mentioned things quite off the cuff. But you saw it as a chance to Attack the Infamous Seaboy. So your changed the tone by pretending to be black and by pretending to be hurt. My next moves were ALL calculated to see if you really were black - I said things that a fellow darky would PLUG into - FEELINGS that to every dark man has felt since childhood. They went RIGHT PAST YOU. You plugged into not a single one. YOU ARE THE TROLL. You changed the tone of this conversation - to one of being PERSONAL. You failed to make good points, but like a troll resorted to childish name calling.

And I don not forgive you!

Oh, and the GANG like activity of getting others to come in on your side don't phase me white boy, I faced many gang types in my past - 3 on e one. You are pathetic.

07-31-05, 03:15 PM	#8
Seaboy Stowaway Posts: n/a Downloads: Uploads:	Redstorm you ain't black. How do I know? The best arguments you missed. I purposely placed several points in my postings aimed at discovering such details. I always do. NOT one of your argmuments align with black history. First of all you tried to bring up the FACT that much of the time I talk like a red-neck. But had you been a real darky you would know that Injuns (as a whole) are some of the most red-neck people on earth - and I am not making a funny about the skin color - I mean red neck like most people understand it). I realize you can't see my skin color, but you can see Sherman Alexie's at: http://www.identitytheory.com/interv...interview.html and you can read where he states: "SA: Yeah, the Indian world is incredibly homophobic. It’s so funny, all these white liberals think that Indians are so loving and peaceful and sacred, but you know, Indians are a bunch of rednecks. " But you see, by his statements and yours we see that you are a WHITE - "white liberals think"...Says Sherman.. and we see you trying to deny I am an Injun cause I often write like a redneck. BUt real Blacks also talk like rednecks - especially among themselves. I don't claim to be an expert about Blacks. I do claim to have called them brothers and Commiserated with them often in the past. Now the second way and trick I used to determine you were not BLACK. When I first posted the fact of me being an Injun, what I stated was I WAS PART INDIAN. Now, to a white that automatically means I am TOTAL Injun. And the postings of other people right after I posted that IS proof. Everyone suddenly started going on about Native Americans and blah blah blah. Any REAL darky knows JUST how it all works. If I had said I was part Black, everyone would suddenly treat me as a FULL African. Whites don't see anything in between - just WHITE or DARK - gray don't exist to them. And Dark man knows this from tiny childhood. A dark man also knows that dark men can act like rednecks, cowboys, and everything in between. But Whites in America and Europe try to pretend that darkies can ONLY be liberal and left-wing - touchy feely and so forth. To whites Injuns are all mystics - religious shamans - when the truth is Injuns kick dogs, get drunk, and spit on flowers just for the hell of it. WE ARE HUMAN you creep! HUMAN and all that goes with that. But my point: you read PART INDIAN to mean I had to be FULL INDIAN. Any any event a full blood Indian or a real Black would have caught that point IN AN INSTANT!!!!!! And your main attack on Seaboy should have been: "You aren't qualified to speak cause you are only PART INDIAN." But you missed that point, cause to you only WHITE AND DARK exists - so you saw me trying to be a FULL INDIAN and so you did not use your best attack on me at all - namely that I am only part Indian. You didn't evewn ask HOW MUCH! But like the whites here, you just let it SLIDE. Now Peter, my old Black Panther friend, HE WOULD HAVE CAUGHT THAT POINT INSTANTLY! Cause to dark men there ARE inbetweens - there is MORE than WHITE and DARK. THere are many grays. Put together, I doubt anything you claim to be. First or last, rather than meeting my arguments - you merely recopy mine - make slight innuendos - like SNICKERS. No your only means of argument is to CALL NAMES. "Troll". Why not just call me an inferior dark man? Calling names like that - with out proof or argument - is no different that racism or prejudging - Prejudice. You couldn't meet my dialog, my thoughts, you could only lash out with a NAME. I find that only people who can't think blurt out 'troll'. Its their pitiful attempt at wiping away a good argument they can't deal with. DID I begin all this anti-nazi crap about a site some guy just posted so that we could download songs? Did I begin this diatribe about : say you're sorry? No, I mentioned things quite off the cuff. But you saw it as a chance to Attack the Infamous Seaboy. So your changed the tone by pretending to be black and by pretending to be hurt. My next moves were ALL calculated to see if you really were black - I said things that a fellow darky would PLUG into - FEELINGS that to every dark man has felt since childhood. They went RIGHT PAST YOU. You plugged into not a single one. YOU ARE THE TROLL. You changed the tone of this conversation - to one of being PERSONAL. You failed to make good points, but like a troll resorted to childish name calling. And I don not forgive you! Oh, and the GANG like activity of getting others to come in on your side don't phase me white boy, I faced many gang types in my past - 3 on e one. You are pathetic.