Quote:
|
And this is relevant... how exactly? It's not. How does this change the fact that he was being bribed/extorted by his supervisor? It doesn't. How is this a problem? It's not; if he's got the ability to make money off something like this, then let him. It's not illegal; there are plenty of other people on TV who do it all the time. Like I said, it's a personal issue- so he's got every right to decide what to do with it and how to treat it. If he wants to keep it private, fine. If he wants to make it public, fine. He's at least respecting the wishes of the employee by keeping her name private.
|
First, my point had nothing to do with the employee.
Secondly, people who profit off of their public image invite public scrutiny, fair or not, consistant with the US' libel laws.
Third, anyone getting involved with a public figure risks publicity for doing so.
So yes, it's relevant.