Forgive me if I point out that the first argument was that folks who disagreed with Mr. Obama because of racism and Jimmy was just pointing that out. Now the argument is that Jimmy didn't call disagreement racism and so where does the supposition now stand? Racism or not? If not why the disagreement. If so then Jimmy is not a good spokesman against racism, because he just recinded his own words.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Skybird
... and I think since quite a while now that that assessment is absolutely right. The level of totally derailed hostility and almost irrational hate tirades against Obama, comparing him to the worst criminals and massmurderes in the history of mankind, cannot be just differing opinion.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8258011.stm |