Quote:
Originally Posted by Aramike
More like grand gestures are meaningless, but alas...
In any case, your argument finds itself in a precarious position. You're not trying to defend the attacts on whalers from a moral standpoint, and that's the fatal flaw.
You can't use the law to justify the SS attacks on whalers, and then turn around and ignore the law regarding said attacks. Either the law validates an action or it does not. If you take the approach that SOME laws validate the attacks, but the laws related to the attacks themselves are irrelevent, then you made the argument about perspective and not law whatsoever.
Meaning, from their view the Japanese are correct in engaging in whaling. Furthermore, from their view, the Japanese could possible be correct in destroying the SS.
And that view is no more or less correct than yours.
|
**** the law! You think every law branch is perfect and even for everyone ? Then you must be simply naive if you do. C'mon! what law SS are braking ? Do they kill or kidnap people ? Do they rob or take over ships from these Japs ? Explain precisly in details right now and here what ****in law are they braking ?! Cuz you already pissed me off with your one way attitude. You think it's not against the law to ignore the limits of allowed quantity of whales that they kill ? They don't care about quatas you know why ? because only what they care about is money they are getting for every single whale they kill! Ipso facto they cover themselves under some 'research' cover what is also a bull**** to make blindly law obeying people all over the world to believe this fairytale!