Quote:
Originally Posted by Aramike
Not relevant to men? Are you nuts?
So wait, let's get this straight - a MAN and woman conceive a child. You know, a child that will effect the rest of both of their lives. ONLY the woman has the choice to carry that child to term. If it's, say, financially inconvienient for the woman, boom - terminate the pregnancy. Let's say it's financially inconvienient for the man (you know, child support and such). What's his out?
Obviously you don't have children else you'd never suggest that a pregnancy is only relevant to the woman.
|
So, if it's financially inconvenient for the man, what is he gonna do? Force her to abort if she wants to keep the baby? And if she doesn't want to carry the child to term, force her to keep it? HUH??? I'd say the decision is entirely up to her.
The legal side of this whole thing might well be relevant to men, but not the physical act, whether it is carried out or not.