Quote:
Originally Posted by mookiemookie
Explain why not. You said the burden of proof for someone making an assetion was on someone who found fault with it. To rebut that, I made an assertion, and now you say you disregard my assertion unless I can prove it.
You can't have it both ways, my friend.
|
He made a statement that sounds logical. You however provided a challenge with such a wide berth that you could fit an aircraft carrier through it. So prove it instead of beating around the bush here.
I've yet to see you do it once! You make a lot of wild claims, but once I'd like to see a source back up your claims! Just once!
Two or three times would be good, but once would be fine for now.
The point being, I'm tired of your accusations while avoiding the need to provide the burden of proof. You have yet to get that mouse rolling and actually click on Google (Bing works better BTW).
Maybe it is the fact that you are funny because you challenge something without having a clue? You have absolutely no clue who has the strictest emissions! None!
Quite frankly, I'd be surprised if any country in this entire world could pass the restriction limitation on California. They constantly make jokes about Kalifornia in the newspapers about restrictions on everything from cars to lawn-mowers out there. They are trying to put catalytic converters on lawn mowers now for gods sake!
Show me a damn country that needs a damn catalytic converter for a lawn mower, and I'll back down!!!
Good luck!
-S