Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamWake
No I would expect them to hire competient concienous drivers. But I assume they dont have the moneys for that so they settle for employees that are neither.
Another 'argument' is that the automated systems breed content. But I dont want to digress.
However there is no excuse for a driver with peoples lives in their hands to act like this. To put it bluntly it's selfish.
If your so tired, bored, hung over, what ever for gods sake dont go to work that day. Its not like some slob that falls asleep at his desk.
Managament not being aware of this type of behaviour are either ignoant, duped, or looking the other way. My money is on the latter.
|
I think Metro driver jobs actually pay pretty well, considering how little the drivers actually do.
I think your point about the automated system is actually pretty accurate. All the drivers have to do is close the doors and announce the next stop. If I had to do that all day, I'd probably fall asleep too. The Metro system is in a sort of gap as far as automation - it's too automated to keep the drivers active, but it's not automated enough to make the drivers redundant (a la the London DLR).
As we covered in a previous thread, Metro's management is a bunch of elected officials who have no experience or competence when it comes to running a mass transit system.
If I were in charge, I'd make the investment and make the system fully automated. However, the current technology that Metro uses isn't reliable enough for that. It seems that an automation fault caused the Red Line crash, and I know there was one incident where a couple drivers had to hit the emergency brakes to prevent a collision in the tunnel under the Potomac. Of course, when the drivers do their job and save lives, it doesn't make the headlines.