FTFA:
Quote:
|
A recent report challenging AGW theory showed significant support with 31,478 U.S. researchers and scientists, many of whom hold Ph.D's,
|
Many? How many ls "many"? Are they peer reviewed? Who are the ones who don't hold PhD's? And the ones who hold PhDs, what are their PhD's in? If I hold a PhD in child psychology, does that mean I'm qualified to speak on climate change issues? Why were these scientists included? Was it opt-in or were their opinions unsolicited? How do they qualify who is a "scientist"? How much weight does their opinion hold? These are the same people that argued secondhand smoke isn't harmful; why should we believe them on this?
When your articles can be sourced to more reputable folks, they may hold more water.