Read paragraph 1 of the executive summary. A little... blatant, for my liking.
Source number... 3 from memory, cites the IPCC. However, climate alarmists no longer use the data gathered by and for the IPCC, because those data sets show cooling over recent years, whilst the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased.
Now, you'll find that the alarmists are using oceanic temperatures to prove AGW.
So on that point alone, the report is proven to be inaccurate.
Of course, I'm ignoring that the origin of the report lies in an attempt to sway undecided policy-makers in the US parliament back to the pro-AGW lobby in order to pass strict new climate change legislation...
Warming is happening on a long-term scale, I won't debate that. i will debate tooth and nail that AGW is a fact, and I'll do everything and anything I can to stop myself being taxed over something we
cannot unequivocally prove, much less control.
