We're going in circles. The bottom line is that science agrees with me. But here's a fun one:
Quote:
There might be a 50/50 chance that what goes up sometimes keeps going
up. Just because you flip a coin 10 billion times and get heads, it doesn't
mean you won't get tails the next time. We can't tell.
No change is required, 50/50 chance that what goes up sometimes keeps
going up might have been true for all eternity, we just have been unlucky
not to observe it yet.
How ever unlikely this it, we can't be 100% sure it is not the case.
|
There is 100% no chance that something, under the same conditions, will keep going up. If so, then the conditions (gravity attracting mass) will have changed to allow that single object to keep going up, thusly invalidating the law in that circumstance.
There is no doubt that there is the phenomenom of a scientific law. It is a term used daily by scientists worldwide. The idea that something may just keep going up despite known conditions is preposterous. One doesn't need an infinite number of results to prove a scientific concept - all that is needed is a consistant, predictable result. In the case of invalidating the law of something going up and coming down, the burden of proof lies with the person making the unobservable claim (that something may keep going up).