Quote:
Originally Posted by AVGWarhawk
Hardly, just stating to close it down without a plan was not to bright and from the looks of it...Congress agrees it was not to bright to state that.
|
It was not bright from the very beginning to create a legal vacuum.
Quote:
I missed that one...can you provide a link?
|
Media and press throughout Europe. Germany. Britain. Italy. Spain. Don't tell me that US media ignored it that completely so that you never took note of it.
Quote:
Some innocents still left? Perhaps. So instead of Baghram we should send them to say, the Bahamas? Much nicer there. Three hots and a cot near the beach? Sweet! Anything else?
|
Save your sarcasm for making yourself happy in lonely moments. It is a principle in any legal system worth the name that guilt must be proven instead of just being claimed, and that this must be acchieved within a reasonable timeframe and by procedural rules countercontrolled by independent and/or public institutions. If you will to skip that, you are not any better than the GeStapo, who acted the very same way like you, and even did so on basis of formally more valid laws than Bush did when chosing that mistaken path that now your country is rightfully attacked for. Not too mention that you open gate, door and window for a culture of diffamation replacing laws and justice, and a culture of mobs in the street lynching people arbitrarily. Evidence for guilt is no longer needed if the public accepts that just the claim for somebody being guilty is enough. that is totally unacceptable.
Bring the prisoners to court, and make them subject to your regular, publicly known laws. That alone is acceptable. anything else is in no way different than the legal system in the GDR, in Saddam's Iraq, or in any other tyranny on the planet - you are not any different to them.
Note that in earlier threads I did not oppose things like torture or imprisonment of terrorists in priciple. I just insist on this being done on basis of public consensus and according changes to existing laws being made, and this still being open to countercontrol by the system of checks and balance that are the very and totally indispensable basis of any national community worth to be desacribed as being just, and democratic.
And please nobody here now distracting
again by telling me that America is not a democracy but a republic. It is a democratic republic - or is it a republic like North Korea? China? GDR? If america by design and intention was not meant to be a democratic state, then the term obviously has no more any meaning.