SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

Torpex752 · 05-17-09, 10:18 AM

Thats a thought I could see.

My problem is that the stuff they found matches the steel erosion that the 911 comission called unexplaned. Nanothermite is only used in construction demolition as it is man made. I find it very sad to find this actually, not overjoyed.

Combine that with the nearly free fall speed of all buildings and it lends merit to the probability that the planes & fire didnt bring the buildings down. Its not impossible, but I find it a little hard to believe that these engineers are completely wrong.

I dont support the govt did it theory, however I am curious why when I look at other catostrophic events involving steel structures failing, submarines not returning to the surface, ships hitting iceburgs, or airplanes crashing, the level of investigation and reconstruction to find out why was and remains much more intense and thorough then this event/situation.

I guess I feel it necessary to say that after serving in the US Submarine force for 20 years and having a "questioning attitude" instilled in me as a critical means of survival and proper way of conducting daily business, after looking at this event from both sides, I have a few unanswered questions. The questions I have are not rocket science, yet there is no sensible answer found to date in any "official" report. None that satifies my understandings.

Frank

05-17-09, 10:18 AM	#5
Torpex752 Lieutenant Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Deep River, CT Posts: 255 Downloads: 1 Uploads: 0	Thats a thought I could see. My problem is that the stuff they found matches the steel erosion that the 911 comission called unexplaned. Nanothermite is only used in construction demolition as it is man made. I find it very sad to find this actually, not overjoyed. Combine that with the nearly free fall speed of all buildings and it lends merit to the probability that the planes & fire didnt bring the buildings down. Its not impossible, but I find it a little hard to believe that these engineers are completely wrong. I dont support the govt did it theory, however I am curious why when I look at other catostrophic events involving steel structures failing, submarines not returning to the surface, ships hitting iceburgs, or airplanes crashing, the level of investigation and reconstruction to find out why was and remains much more intense and thorough then this event/situation. I guess I feel it necessary to say that after serving in the US Submarine force for 20 years and having a "questioning attitude" instilled in me as a critical means of survival and proper way of conducting daily business, after looking at this event from both sides, I have a few unanswered questions. The questions I have are not rocket science, yet there is no sensible answer found to date in any "official" report. None that satifies my understandings. Frank Last edited by Torpex752; 05-17-09 at 11:03 AM.