[Skybird]

The public-political-economical dispute pro or contra the term "global warming" is a desperate attempt to hide man's major share of the responsibility for climate change. While possible short-termed effects of of a general warming may indicate a colling. the general trend is beyond doubt. Glaciers are retreating and disaapearing since decades. The oceans become warmer and warmer, and more acid, climate zones shift, from the warm equatorial regions towards the south and north.. Desertification has multiplied in speed. In general, polar ice is weakening, despite regional paradoxical effects. Flora and fauna changes such that these changes can only be explained by a warming trend, not a cooling trend. warmth-preferring species move into regions that were colder before and thus were no habitats before to these species, but now are.

He who has eyes to see, should see. And if he still does not today, although the signs are legion, than the chances are that he prefers to keep his eyes shut, not needing to see what he does not want to see. Economic lobbyism does the rest, with hundreds of millions of dollar being fired in the propaganda war against changing the economy and adapting societies to the changing times.