View Single Post
Old 04-16-09, 08:49 PM   #2
GoldenRivet
Subsim Aviator
 
GoldenRivet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,729
Downloads: 146
Uploads: 0


Default

Ill try to keep it short and simple.

and this is just my opinion so here is a grain of salt - gratis

Why i think Sh3 is technically superior to SH4 - in stock condition of course, is that SH3 had more out of the box stability.

i could tell that ubi wanted to do a lot of neat things with SH4 because it has so much potential but - in the end that potential was left unrealized until modded.

while i appreciate the attempt by ubi to attract new gamers to the subsim genre - they went about it by "hollywooding" the game into oblivion.

what i mean is they added all this eye candy, souped up the graphics, made it look good... but in the end i think most hard core sub simmers want substance. (they would rather have an intelligent cutie vs. a stupid mega-beauty)

to make SH5 they should avoid this mistake in the future.

personally I would love to see the entire sub interior modeled.

some rigs cant handle that so...so make an option

perhaps check boxes?

[] pretty grahics / plain jane command room
[] ok graphics / but fully modeled interior
[] pretty graphics with fully modeled interior (fast machines only)
[] piss for graphics with fully modeled interior etc

the range of experience of the subsimmers is vast... so the game has to be highly scalable in realism and difficulty.
__________________
GoldenRivet is offline   Reply With Quote