Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockstar
Because a certain theory relies heavily on science to arbitrarliy add zeros to time. Because they say for creatures to evolve it MUST take a gazillion of years right?
|
It takes time. There is no specific way to calculate it as of yet, however, when trying to determine possible future evolutionary paths (which in its own right is very difficult).
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rockstar
Even if it were correct evolution science still does not answer where we came from or how 'something' came from 'nothing'.
|
It's not supposed to. Once again, that's dealing more with abiogenesis and the scientific debate of the origins of life, which has nothing to do with evolution.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rockstar
If we were created by I.D. 6,000 years is plausible.
|
That's a steep "if" you just used there.
If you find evidence for ID, come tell us.
If you can confirm something along the lines of ID exists using the scientific method, come tell us.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rockstar
We should be able to discuss it
|
Not until you confirm its existence.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rockstar
, to reason with one another rather than one side calling the other stupid, ignorent, or blind.
|
It's stupid to think the Earth is 6,000 years old because we know it's not 6,000 years old. The oldest rock on the planet is over 4 billion years old. It's stupid to think snakes can talk because they don't possess vocal chords to begin with. It's stupid to think that a global flood happened because we know from geology no such event ever did occur.
Creationists in general hold stupid beliefs, are ignorant because they are ignoring the facts, and rely on blind faith to back their position in the whole debate and not tangible evidence.