Hmm being sick and also tired, but how did heliocentric thought (and the opposite) come into the argument? The father in the trial was concerned, according to the article, that the child was only receiving religiously slanted science with creationism and excluding evolution. I would also be concerned if I was the father simply because I have yet to see any strong evidence supporting creationism that hasn't been by in large rationaly disproved. Evolution does have stronger evidence to support it, though it also almost certainly flawed and/or incomplete given our base nature.
|