Though it may be worded differently now, it did indeed at one point say just that and was "scripture" at that time. I would also further point out that the KJV was written long after Galileo's theories had been widely accepted, so naturally the bible changed to incorporate that bit of knowledge. Lastly the bible is a constantly evolving entity with many variants and spin offs.
Also in case you forgot the Catholic Church's Latin bible was what the KJV bible was based on and was the only bible back when heliocentric thought was being argued. Also the Catholic Church was Biblicaly based (virtually all bibles in use today are decedents of the 'original' Latin bible, and not the teachings of the Cathars, or the dead sea scrolls).
As for Hebrew that's very dicey to use for many reasons not including the fact that ancient Hebrew did not have or indicate vowels which means that there can be many different possibilities for what word was meant, and on top of it each word can have multiple meanings. This is why debating what the Torah actually means is so popular in the Jewish faith. If you like though I do have a copy of what is considered one of the best (and most recent) translations of the Torah to English with full foot notes on the various debates on words and meanings, So I could check and see what it says on some of those "old testament" quotes.
|