View Single Post
Old 03-08-09, 01:08 PM   #12
CaptainHaplo
Silent Hunter
 
CaptainHaplo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,404
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Fatty, you have a very good point. I would agree that the moderates just want a seat at the table. However, you can't make a different agreement with every splinter - and how would you be able to tell if/when a violation occured who did it? You have to remember - your point of it not being a central controlling body is both right and wrong. There still is a heirarchy. Who do you make an agreement with, and then how do you know when things go to heck in a handbasket, which faction screwed it up for everyone? You surely don't expect them to police their own do you? After all - the entire Islamic religion has shown its incapable - or unwilling - to do so.

Therefore - any agreement made already has "deniability" for any violation by the terrorists build in. Not the right move.
__________________
Good Hunting!

Captain Haplo
CaptainHaplo is offline   Reply With Quote