Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SUBMAN1
Too many crackpot ideas here. Listen, the Peta org and Peta pres have all said that animals are more important than humans. So why the sympathetic BS? Someone explain it to me because I'm not fathoming the sympathizers here.
-S
|
It's all there in the article. Try and look past your bias for a minute and read it again. You'll notice that PETA never said that they don't care about the fire victims, nor did they insinuate anything of the kind. They merely recommended charging the arsonists with animal cruelty, presumably on top of the other charges. That makes sense; prosecutors often charge defendants with every applicable crime to strengthen their case.
Sometimes dumb people can say smart things. Whatever you think of PETA, in this case they're in the right, which you would have seen if you had actually thought about it rather than just mindlessly react.