View Single Post
Old 02-14-09, 10:32 AM   #5
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Platapus
I think you may be reading a bit more into the story...

No where in the article is it saying that PETA want animal cruelty to be the only charges placed against the arsonist. I get from the reading that PETA wants to ensure that ADDITIONAL charges of cruelty to animals are levied.

As for David Tree, I agree totally with what PETA did in this situation. Mr. Tree did save an animal and it is only fitting that an organization like PETA recognized Mr. Tree's most compassionate act.

I am not a fan of PETA, but in this case, based on this article, I think you are being a bit harsh on PETA.
Translation = We could care less about the people that were killed, but MAKE SURE you charge them with animal cruelty.

-S
__________________
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote