Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sea Demon
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mikhayl
Anyway it's funny how people praise Bush for his record against terrorism when in fact the worst terrorist attack on the US was carried while he was in office  |
If Mr. Bush's predecessor (yet another Democrat) had done his job, and not have taken the "sweep it under the rug" approach to the few terrorist attacks on his watch, 9/11 most likely would never have happened. |
Bull. It's the ole, Clinton's Fault trick that repubs love to use when Bush is under political fire.
Every Single One of these Anti-Terror policies were reactionary. Bush had a year to enact whatever he wanted to "Protect Us" And that would not have done a damn thing.
I like how the new fear tactic the freeps use. That Obama making all these decisions will lead to Osama (Even tho he is nothing but a PR image now) or some other wackjob to attack america. Almost to the point where they hope it will happen. (And don't tell me some of the deeper right wing wackos don't)
Like I said, Get new material. And no the Bear reference went out a decade ago.
In case you have not noticed. We are the laughing stock of the world. What good would they get from hitting us? It would unite the world against them again. They've won in Iraq, They will wait patiently for decades if they have to but the moment we are finally out of that hellhole they will get oggles of money from China and Iran for their oil assets.
Want to defeat them? Get us the HELL out of this dependance on their oil. That is the only way. Not gitmo, Not constant war, not Patriot act 2.