View Single Post
Old 01-01-09, 05:21 PM   #11
SUBMAN1
Rear Admiral
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,866
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by goldorak
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zachstar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapt Z
I'm a sub buff, but in this economy.....why?
Because the carrier is more and more useless. A serious attack using diesels is likely more than enough to bring one down in a serious war. (Look at how close they get when it is not a war)

We need more subs to replace the lost ability of the supers.
If you loose the supercarriers, you loose much more than could ever be compensated by tens of new SSN. An attack sub has no strategic value, it cannot project force as a CVN battlegroup can. The strengh of the us navy is not in its submarine force, but in its 12 supercarriers dislocated throughout the world.
I thought they had 15?

-S

PS. Never mind - 3 are in process of being built. There are 12 active and 3 more that will be active.
__________________

Last edited by SUBMAN1; 01-01-09 at 05:24 PM.
SUBMAN1 is offline   Reply With Quote