[Frame57]

Originally Posted by bradclark1

A pity you found the comment nitwitty when it was made seriously. To me someone with your line of thinking isn't seeing whats in front of your face. A lot of gays can be identified just by seeing people walk by. For instance a person walking/moving in a cross sex manner. Mannerisims while communicating, etc. All the grief gays get from the straight community it is beyond belief that people would become gay by choice. I find gay sex personaly revolting and can't imagine someone waking up and say "Hey! I think I'll love and have relations with just other men." voluntarily. I've known enough gays to know it's not a choice thing. So to me for someone that has your line of reasoning that its a choice thing or a disease shows someone who is sheltered from the real world. So take your 75 points to the mall and do some people watching. And also just for your education it's not only gay men that travels the hershey highway.

Well "Brad", you seem to have a severe misunderstanding in human sexuality and well most other related topics that would require higher education to debate rather than this "Mall" mentality you prescribe. I do not have to join them to know them. You obviously gravitate toward that philosophy. Also, by golly you are right not all anal sex is limited to gay men, however 99% of those that have corrective surgery are gay men, so statistically speaking what would that tell you. So to have an educated opinion on this whole matter IYO is to be sheltered? Uh? Let's see where do I begin...Born In SF, I have gay relatives for that matter and we discuss these points without resorting to the "Mall" word. Been around the world a few times, been married, raised kids, have higher education with real world experience. Ah, yes and forgot the most sterling prize and I do boast it, real submariner for a decade...So if you think that is being sheltered let's hear what you have seen and done that makes you squirm because I have arrived at a different polar opinion that what you have??? All the points I have made are indicators that I feel make a case that homosexuality is not an Indigenous process, therefore it can and should not be defined the same as a heterosexual relationship. Son, all you have to do is look around and see the human race. We are here because of heterosexual relationships. From that very simple observation one can conclude that homosexuality does not support the wheel of life. This in no way means that gay people are substandard and should be treated in any ill mannered way. But to define 5000 years of recorded history pertaining to marriage and have it hijacked is just not acceptable to me.