OK what bugs me here is that you are one of these people who reads a blog or few blogs that have a differing view to the mainstream press and conclude that it is more accurate or pure news as it wasn't written by "the establishment" shall we say. But blogs are more than likely even more biased or badly written as the nature of a blog is someones own personal view. Look at the ones subman1 likes to link to to support his arguments.
I'm not saying the Iraq war was justified or that coalition troops haven't abused their position but to say everything is a conspiracy is crass.
Also on the whole coalition troops have acted properly in accordance with the rules set out. Your gloating over these two soldiers really ticks me off. Why? Because the soldiers are doing the best job they can set by their political masters. Some bad eggs yes, the same in every army. To say there was no terrorism in Iraq before the war is daft. Saddam kept everything under the kosh. That however is not to say there were no movements againts him or attempts to destabilise him.
__________________
|