![]() |
BBC Madness
I have blown my top today, I am in a very angry mood that bloody PC BBC should be renamed the Muslim Political Correctness Broadcasting Corporation and here's why. :mad: :mad:
Quote:
It's time to give the BBC the :/\\chop |
Crazy. I am against offending muslims with intent (you see what happends if you piss the Radicals off) but that is just...crazy. :nope:
|
Quote:
Al-Jazeera in English is simply a redundancy. |
Quote:
Do you comprehend where your attitude is heading? |
Quote:
|
very bad reporting, someone noticed the symbol and it was part of a decision making debate whoo-pee-doo.
i like the bbc and have yet to find a less bias source. |
http://www.bbc.co.uk/commissioning/i...f/bbc_logo.gif
KNIFE WIELDING MAN ARRESTED AT BBC CENTRE A man was intercepted by police today whilst trying to forcefully enter the BBC News center carrying a knife, he was believed to have been shouting something about "PC Madness". The mans identity is yet to be revealed by police. |
DON'T LOOK AT ME :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :roll: :roll:
|
I have red BBC world for years, as well as following their Tv programs until they had been kicked out of local cable network last year. Even me feels like one year or longer that there is a very bad political shifting taking plac einside the BBC. They have lost a lot of my former respect.
I also do not like their new way of doing nature docus, wether it be about the universe, or wild animals, aor whatever. In past decades, BBC docus were very competently done, sometimes spectucular. but nowadays music and narration are doing a message drill towards a directions of sensationalism and human thoughts of competion, war and fighting that has nothing to do anymore with objective description. In earlier years/deacdes their docus described and left it to the viewer to think about what he has seen. today the thinking is pushed and manipulated into a certain directon I find hard to catch in words. The audience is no longer expected to think itself. It is given a (wanted) explaantion, and should believe in that, and feel convinced, and remain shut up - alternative thinking not welcomed. I wonder why Britain is fighting so bitterly against the EU - if in many details it already is overtaking the folly of Brussel'S pc ambitions and programs. The story Steed is quoting is simply this: totally unacceptable. Yesterday I saw Geroge Lucas' "THX 1138" on TV, for the second time. The parallels to the present escaped my awareness when I have seen it first time, ten or twelve years bago. Yesterday they left me speechless. Very good movie. It was depressing. |
Quote:
|
From my reading of the Daily Mail article it appears that the BBC were internally debating wheather any of it's newsreaders should have the right to wear religious symbols be it a crucifix a headscarf or any other religious or politcal symbol. I can't see any indication in the article that this is as a result of the BBC bowing down to Muslim anger or pressure. As the article highlights:
Quote:
Quote:
|
We don't need no education! :nope:
|
the BBC is a pathetic, openly anti-american, anti-israeli, pro-palestinian militant, pro-hezbollah pathetic organisation and Im ashamed to call it British! Hey us Brits have to pay £130 a year for this crap else we are taken to court! the corporation is a disgrace and id find porn channels more informative. :p
|
the trouble with getting rid of something you have to worry about what will replace it....if in the current pathetic climate of PC the BBC is having paranoid delusions regarding the necklaces of their presenters ....in that climate what do you suppose would be proposed as an alternative????
ultimately if you want to influence what is shown and how it is shown on telly the only thing that would work would be to switch it of entirely and throw it in a skip.....now then if half the country did that you see changes over night..telly is not just telly it's the principal tool of propoganda and population control available to the powers that be (or that don't be that is the question :rotfl: )..... looking for big brother...look no further than the exact spot in your living room that Orwell predicted it would be...same format.. same message...same purpose:hmm: sounds over the top.....but how do we know that isn't what were supposed to think when some-one suggest the same thing...and if we do think it's over the top....try to trace exactly why the thought appears over the top. and you might get onto the trail of bread crumbs..not that it matters... if the BBC can depict the PC version of events and allow it to affect their choices regarding even minute unimportant details such as the jewelry worn by their presenters...then the public will accept it without question as correct..or enough of them to ensure it gets woven into the general publics way of looking at the world....and who elects the government??? the public does.. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.