SeaQueen |
10-01-06 10:02 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Linton
SQ ,I have muddled along using my own settings for a while-I was just looking for something a bit more scientific and usable.Some golden rules as it were for torpedo settings and also spread patterns and other info.
|
My point is that there's only so much value to be extracted from more scientific approaches on account of the torpedo search rate being so high. Very frequently the best thing to do is just get a rough idea of the target's position and let the torpedo do the work. Frankly, it's smarter than you are. I spend a lot of time working out Ekelund ranges, tracking bearing rates, etc. and I still find myself asking, "Why is the torpedo going over there?" Answer: I was close, but no cigar.
It's also unclear how much more usable it'd be for someone who wasn't a serious naval enthusiast. By that I mean, you're perfectly comfortable sitting down and working out problems with a maneuvering board, have a working understanding of search theory, and spend a lot of time doing things like estimating areas of uncertainty surrounding your target.
Part of what's fascinating to me about naval warfare is that it's mathematically intensive (and always has been). If you really want to get into that aspect of things, the best thing to do is just start reading up on the subject extensively, and then let your creativity go to work. I've recommended books before that contain what you need to know.
Besides, the bottom line is, provided your TMA is half way decent, you should be able to secure a reasonable likelyhood of hitting a target. Wire guidence and the torpedo's own sensors give you a great deal of leeway. Being clever about your presets and doing good TMA just means that you have more leeway to spare. :-)
|