New Japanese warship addition "Sub Chaser No.13"
 

Imperial Japanese Navy warship "Sub Chaser No.13 class".

Since there were few Japanese warships, I made.
Completeness is low like my skill.
Please enjoy at least atmosphere.

http://img364.imageshack.us/img364/857/jsc03bk77.th.jpghttp://img364.imageshack.us/img364/857/jsc03bk7.th.jpg
http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/3658/jsc02bm3.th.jpg
http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/2488/jsc01gr7.th.jpg

Known Error
Since the ship of a base is flower class, there are the following problems.
-1 axis propeller
-Y-GUN(type 94 Depthcharge-thrower) is decoration. Is not discharged.
-The position of an ammo, a fuel tank, etc. is the same as flower class.
-Armaments and equipment are not Japanese Navy. They are the armaments currently prepared beforehand.

Install
Please overwrite a file or use JSGME.
When you are not stock SH3, please edit manually, without using EnglishNames.cfg and GermanNames.cfg enclosed.
Please add the following 1 lines to "/data/sea/EnglishNames.cfg and GermanNames.cfg" file.

/data/sea/EnglishNames.cfg
JSC13=Sub Chaser No.13

/data/sea/GermanNames.cfg
JSC13=U-boot Verfolger Nr.13



Download Link
version 1.0
http://chomu-ab.atso-net.jp/wiki/ind...EE%C0%F8%C4%FA

(old version 0.3)
http://chomu-ab.atso-net.jp/wiki/ind...EE%C0%F8%C4%FA

Release notes
v1.0
-Optimization of a zon file.
(The collision judging and the explosion effect were made more real.)
-The texture of a boat was remade.
-Other some fixes.


Thank you for reading my poor English.

Nice one could be used very well in Penang as a guard ship for the secret Harbour....

Nice, but I don't think 'No. 13' is part of the type name. I'm under the impression that they all had individual numbers, rather than names. If I'm right, it should just be 'Japanese Sub Chaser'.

I also believe that these were the same ships the Japanese themselves called 'Kaibokan', and came in two classes, called simply 'A' and 'B'.

I am somewhat vague on that, though. I don't have any of my books close enough to look at.

I always thought that the two classes of Kaibokans were C and D.

BTW - Great ship, have already downloaded it.:up:

secret harbour ???? am i missing something ???

There is a Secret Uboot harbour in Penang for the refuelling of the Monsun Long Range Boats which operated in Indian and Pacific Ocean . Only Type IX d2 can reach that. That was the place where Japan and Germany exchanged informations and other things during the war. This Harbour was historicaly guarded by the japanese and was a very secret base during WWII.

There was Japanese Sub-Chaser from No.1 to 63.
There were 4 kinds of standard models of a ship in it.(No.1, No.3, No.4, No.13)
The number of 4 kind is a name ship, respectively.
The model of this MODS is No.13 mass-produced most.
Since I am poor at English, my naming may be inaccurate.
What kind of name is suitable? "sub-chaser type No.13", "No.13 class sub-chaser", or other names.

Incidentally, when "Kaiboukan (Escort)" is roughly divided, they is 4 classes.
It is D from Type A.
A class is divided into "Shimusyu" and the "Etorofu" class.
B class is divided into the "Mikura", "Ukuru", and "Niburi" class.

Now, "Kaiboukan" of C class is under manufacture.:D
http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/5346/escc1xm7.th.jpg

So if i head to this Penang will i find this harbour? - in the game

I think he's talking about the " REAL " Penang mate not sure because i've never left the atlantic :oops:

Yes. Although it's in the wrong place (by a little way) and don't expect much action there (at least until GWX).

It might be best to include the class name instead of a specific name of a ship. Thus, for example, if you included a Shimusyu class subchaser you could name it "Shimusyu Subchaser" instead of "Subchaser #..."

I've been to Penang just out for the hell of it,It took ages to get there and I found not a lot to shoot at. The only intresting stuff I found was around Aden a few ships and a constant barage of Aircraft.

Got it. When I was reading the convoy records they just included a number: "Subchaser No. 56", for example. I wasn't clear on the class distinctions.

Thanks for clearing that up.

Then perhaps using "type" instead of "No." as in "Subchaser Type 13" might sound natural?

i assume it must be one of these ... right ??

http://www.combinedfleet.com/CH-13_c.htm

http://www.combinedfleet.com/Subchaser.jpg