Unwanted truths
 

by David Warren


I’ve touched upon “just war” several times in this space, during the last few weeks. I will continue touching it today. The issue is already an urgent one; its significance can only grow in the foreseeable future, as the encounter between fanatical Islam and the West spreads from mere terror incidents to open guerrilla warfare on various fronts.

We see in the Middle East just now, how the conflagration is spreading. Hezbollah enjoyed little support in the Arab world, when it kidnapped two Israeli soldiers, and began firing rockets at an unprecedented rate into northern Israel. The Arabs feared Hezbollah’s aggressive sponsors -- Iran, principally -- even more than they hated Israel. The Saudi and Egyptian governments were among those which actually criticized Hezbollah more sharply, at first.

But the conflict in Lebanon has gone on for nearly a month, and the hatred of Israel comes back to the fore. Both Western and Arab media have had the opportunity to direct rage against Israel, over the deaths of civilians. Neither make an issue of the fact Hezbollah’s whole fighting strategy involves the use of women and children as “human shields”, or in some cases of which I am aware, as “live bait” to lure Israeli soldiers into ambushes.

The Israeli military policy is to hold fire against any building in which soldiers believe civilians are sheltering, even if they believe Hezbollah fighters are also present. This policy goes well beyond the Geneva Conventions, which anyway don’t apply to combat with irregular fighters. Moreover, by slowing Israeli progress in destroying Hezbollah, it grants time for pressure against Israel to be built, internationally.

The entirely predictable result of the media effort, to sensationalize “Israeli atrocities” -- including one at Qana last week that was probably faked -- has been to trigger waves of anti-Semitic rage, across the Muslim world, and on the Left side of the political spectrum throughout the West. (Events, such as the shooting spree in the Seattle Jewish Federation office the Friday before last, do not give sufficient pause. But was that not a natural consequence of anti-Israel incitements?)

As I write, Shia demonstrators are now rioting against Israel in Iraq. Add this to the effect of constant terrorist attacks, on Shia targets, by Sunni “insurgents” -- supplied, like Hezbollah, by Iran and Syria -- and the prospect of a civil war becomes real. One which can only serve Iran’s interests.

Meanwhile, those of you who missed the Nuremberg rallies, and Herr Hitler's progress through Germany in the 1930s, may now review President Ahmadinejad’s latest speech this week in both video clip and translation at memritv.org. Before a huge crowd, chanting “Death to Israel”, and then “Death to America”, he dwells upon various blood-libels against the Jews, mixing these together with a reprise of what the media have been reporting from Lebanon. He boasts of Iran’s nuclear technology, and looks forward to the imminent “Fire of the Wrath”.

What difference has been made, by Israel’s, and the West’s, “just war” policies -- with either the enemy, or the media? Every allied accident is presented as purposeful, and where there was no accident, “collateral damage” is made up. Moreover, the object of Hezbollah’s fight is not to defeat Israel -- it can’t -- but rather to whip up an international “anti-Zionist” frenzy, and turn it specifically to the advantage of Iran. They “think globally, but act locally”.

The way Israel is now fighting -- and the U.S. and allies are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan -- must be reconsidered. The enemy is himself quite indifferent to civilian suffering, as he shows by using his own people as pawns. He consciously uses our own, Western, moral reticence against us.

By openly stating that we will, under no circumstances, attack targets where civilians are present, we “hand the foe a blueprint of our acts, incite him to step over our carefully drawn line, encourage his vice and incur our own defeat.” (I am quoting a priest who has considered the broader implications of the Catholic just war doctrine.)

Even “just war” acknowledges that, as in medicine, real mercy can sometimes require ruthlessness. We have forgotten this in the West. If we want to save civilians, over the longer run, we must resolve to call the enemy’s bluff. Show him by our actions that hiding behind baby carriages will not save him. For the enemy will only stop using “human shields” when they cease to serve his purposes.



http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/ind...rticle&sid=339

text markings in bold and italic by Skybird

Not these old worn out (not to mention in so many cases, totally false) excuses AGAIN.

The Human Shields lie exposed for what is:

http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2006...ebano13902.htm

And not only are they liars, they're hypocrits as well:

http://ancapistan.typepad.com/unfair...inian_boy.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4314898.stm

From John Pilger, award winning war correspondent, film-maker and author:

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/...hizbullah.html

And finally, exhibit D:

http://www.nationalvanguard.org/printer.php?id=9755

Therefore if the enemy has no innocents, of what value would a human shield be to him? None.

Time to trot out some new IDF talking points Skybird.

Oh, and speaking of using civilians and "human shields", would you call these guys in the black hats and white shirts around the artillery, civilians, human shields, or is this just the new IDF uniform?

Don't you guys ever get tired of this? :dead:

Time out is needed it's boring alot of us. :roll: :p

Yes. :-?

Frankly I am getting bored with these threads. Especially when it starts off with a copy and paste of some article that backs up what a person believes.

Boring....basically we know pretty much most people's positions here, they aren't going to change them. Move on people, there are more fun things to talk about.

He did not use his tags on this thread. Possible tags could have been:
[Boring]
[Same old stuff]
[Political]
[Middle East]
Etc, etc. Even I'm getting :roll: with this stuff.

Well, i'd say that if Hezbollah were to attack that particular artillery emplacement while those civilians were there and some or all of them were killed or injured in the cross fire it'd be their own fault.

Of course i'd expect you, Scandium, the self proclaimed forum icon of impartiality, to immediately make several dozen posts containing dozens of links to Israeli biased sources and using several nazi execution pictures to compare Hezbollah to hitler and his henchmen. Right?

And we're off and running again.....

I'm with you there Xabb. :yep: :yep:

I left the forum for almost two months because it was like watching repeats of a sitcom on tv that you just can't stand. Coming back here it seems to not have changed too much. You could almost confuse Subsim General Topic forums for a mirror of Jihadwatch thanks to Skybird's almost daily postings on the subject of Islam and associated topics. This sums it up for me:

http://usera.imagecave.com/DavidHeid...ger350x450.jpg

Giddy up horsie. :D

Wake me up when we get some fun on here, all this doom and gloom is making me feel sick.

It even becomes more than my inherent pessimism can endure. Weh! Weh!