Quote:
Originally Posted by STEED
Quote:
Originally Posted by joea
We'd still need something to replace it with. :roll:
|
Suggestions anyone? ;)
|
A new organisation (like the UN replaced the League of Nations) with new rules, I can say right away some countries, like North Korea would not be in. Rules? Well the "New" UN should do less, more basic stuff. Leave specialised organs like the WTO for trade, WHO for health or direct bilateral or multilateral state efforts. Human rights? hmmmm better not mention it the UN should probably not get into that. Again, leave it to Amensty International or like groups they are more effective. Terrorism, if we could ever agree on a definition states that sponsor it should not be allowed to join. States like North Korea I exclude because I say so, and Kim is too wierd.:rotfl:
No states that are considered threats to peace and non-proliferation as well as terror sponsores ought to be excluded. Again, keep it simple and limited though, and smaller and cheaper too. Just IMO.
|