SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   Silent Hunter III (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=182)
-   -   Advantage of VIIC (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=94733)

Immelman 06-19-06 08:07 AM

Advantage of VIIC
 
Hello all, I have been searching the web and the manaul for the following info. I even went to Uboat.net. What the heck is the advantage of the VIIC over the VIIB other then 3 sec of dive time. The VIIB is faster, smaller in size = less chance of being detected has the same armement. So why would any one choose the VIIC?

Any comments or thoughts would be appreciated
Thanks

STEED 06-19-06 08:26 AM

That 3 seconds is very important to staying alive. ;)

HunterICX 06-19-06 08:32 AM

:up: 3 seconds saved my ass from beeing bombed by planes...the DC's just fell behind my Subs Big But :doh:

Drebbel 06-19-06 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HunterICX
:up: 3 seconds saved my ass from beeing bombed by planes...the DC's just fell behind my Subs Big But :doh:

If they would fall close to the bow a slower uboat might have been better ;)

Khayman 06-19-06 09:05 AM

http://www.uboatwar.net/VII.htm

Scroll down to the Type VIIC and it says that the VIIB suffered from a lack of internal space for fitting new technology. So they built the larger VIIC.

Immelman 06-19-06 10:08 AM

Thanks guys for all the replies. I am currently in a IIA it is March '40 and I am trying to see where to go from there VIIB or VIIC. I shall give it more consideration.

Thanks again

Hartmann 06-19-06 09:55 PM

Smaller boat, less time to Dive and more maneurability. and those few secons can save your sub .

I have a IXB that has a little more time to dive and a lot of torpedoes load (22) I like larger boats since sh1 and i found it a good balance (size-load-dive time) in the late 1941.
I donīt want the IXC because is a bit too larger and takes more time to dive.

Perhaps in the late war with a lot of aircrafts could be better a smaller boat or stay deck awash at 7 meters and save time to dive.

Kruger 06-20-06 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hartmann
Smaller boat, less time to Dive and more maneurability. and those few secons can save your sub .

I have a IXB that has a little more time to dive and a lot of torpedoes load (22) I like larger boats since sh1 and i found it a good balance (size-load-dive time) in the late 1941.
I donīt want the IXC because is a bit too larger and takes more time to dive.

Perhaps in the late war with a lot of aircrafts could be better a smaller boat or stay deck awash at 7 meters and save time to dive.


Personally i like smaller boats, and the one a appreciate very much and do not want to change for a VIIC..is my U-100 type VIIB. It's fast and agile underwater, and i like the aggesive look of the bows of the VIIB.

Khayman 06-20-06 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hartmann
Perhaps in the late war with a lot of aircrafts could be better a smaller boat or stay deck awash at 7 meters and save time to dive.

It's not really a disadvantage. I use a sensor mod (SensorPak mod or something like that?!?) and I get more than adequate warning when aircraft are using radar. I was hunting a ship and 3 times I had to crash dive for aircraft in my Type IXC. However I didn't go into the depths straight away, since I was determined to get that damned ship! I got my radar warnings then stayed on the surface at flank speed and only crash dived when they were getting too close for comfort. Not close enough for them to be in visual range but just before they were.

You'd be amazed at how fast a Type IXC can go down when you're already at flank speed, and that's without running with decks awash.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Đ 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.