SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   HMS Astute readying (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=92719)

Kapitan 05-02-06 09:35 AM

HMS Astute readying
 
Just found that HMS Astute is almost ready for launch it wont be long till she is fully operational and in the fleet just got to wait for the other 5 and it will mean buisness.

Thanks navy news. :up:

Oberon 05-02-06 10:14 AM

Sweeet!

What with the first Type 45 coming into service....all we need now are our JSFs for air cover and we'll be sorted again :up:

STEED 05-02-06 11:08 AM

We want pics. :yep:

Kapitan 05-02-06 11:13 AM

Buy navy news then £1.40 from any local news agent, or subscribe online at www.navynews.co.uk

STEED 05-02-06 11:15 AM

WHAT!!! I am hard up these days. ;)

micky1up 05-02-06 01:54 PM

i think that the name of one of the otheres going to be built rocks a submarine named AMBUSH

JSLTIGER 05-02-06 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon
Sweeet!

What with the first Type 45 coming into service....all we need now are our JSFs for air cover and we'll be sorted again :up:


Of course, you kind of need carriers that are large enough to deploy those JSFs from as well. That means you're stuck waiting for the CVF (Queen Elizabeth?) class carriers, which should be ready at some point within 2012-2015.

Oberon 05-02-06 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSLTIGER
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon
Sweeet!

What with the first Type 45 coming into service....all we need now are our JSFs for air cover and we'll be sorted again :up:


Of course, you kind of need carriers that are large enough to deploy those JSFs from as well. That means you're stuck waiting for the CVF (Queen Elizabeth?) class carriers, which should be ready at some point within 2012-2015.

Details...details... :(

TLAM Strike 05-02-06 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSLTIGER
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon
Sweeet!

What with the first Type 45 coming into service....all we need now are our JSFs for air cover and we'll be sorted again :up:


Of course, you kind of need carriers that are large enough to deploy those JSFs from as well. That means you're stuck waiting for the CVF (Queen Elizabeth?) class carriers, which should be ready at some point within 2012-2015.

HUH? Is the FAA not getting the B like the USMC? Those can take off our Tarawa and Wasp class Amphibious assault ships which have a flight deck comparable to a Invincible class ASW Carrier.

JSLTIGER 05-02-06 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike
Quote:

Originally Posted by JSLTIGER
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon
Sweeet!

What with the first Type 45 coming into service....all we need now are our JSFs for air cover and we'll be sorted again :up:


Of course, you kind of need carriers that are large enough to deploy those JSFs from as well. That means you're stuck waiting for the CVF (Queen Elizabeth?) class carriers, which should be ready at some point within 2012-2015.

HUH? Is the FAA not getting the B like the USMC? Those can take off our Tarawa and Wasp class Amphibious assault ships which have a flight deck comparable to a Invincible class ASW Carrier.

They are, but the Invincibles are too small to field an adequate number of JSFs. The CVFs for the RN are needed to have an adequate air arm at sea.

Oberon 05-02-06 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSLTIGER
Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike
Quote:

Originally Posted by JSLTIGER
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon
Sweeet!

What with the first Type 45 coming into service....all we need now are our JSFs for air cover and we'll be sorted again :up:


Of course, you kind of need carriers that are large enough to deploy those JSFs from as well. That means you're stuck waiting for the CVF (Queen Elizabeth?) class carriers, which should be ready at some point within 2012-2015.

HUH? Is the FAA not getting the B like the USMC? Those can take off our Tarawa and Wasp class Amphibious assault ships which have a flight deck comparable to a Invincible class ASW Carrier.

They are, but the Invincibles are too small to field an adequate number of JSFs. The CVFs for the RN are needed to have an adequate air arm at sea.

Would be nice to have A naval air arm, full stop... :damn:

Godalmighty83 05-02-06 02:57 PM

a few jsf's would be much more effective then what the carriers are currently using to down enemy fighters, which is currently stern looks and abusive language.

TLAM Strike 05-02-06 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSLTIGER
Quote:

Originally Posted by TLAM Strike
Quote:

Originally Posted by JSLTIGER
Quote:

Originally Posted by Oberon
Sweeet!

What with the first Type 45 coming into service....all we need now are our JSFs for air cover and we'll be sorted again :up:


Of course, you kind of need carriers that are large enough to deploy those JSFs from as well. That means you're stuck waiting for the CVF (Queen Elizabeth?) class carriers, which should be ready at some point within 2012-2015.

HUH? Is the FAA not getting the B like the USMC? Those can take off our Tarawa and Wasp class Amphibious assault ships which have a flight deck comparable to a Invincible class ASW Carrier.

They are, but the Invincibles are too small to field an adequate number of JSFs. The CVFs for the RN are needed to have an adequate air arm at sea.

Hmmm too bad folding wings like on the C weren't included in the design. (or where they? :hmm: )

Still I think that if it was operating with a US CVBG it could provide a good number of F/A-35Bs if they got rid of their AEW and some ASW aircraft since the USN has arguably the better aircraft for those roles.

XabbaRus 05-02-06 03:49 PM

V/STOL JSF waste of time.

Since we are getting a big ship we should get the CTOL version for teh RN and teh V/STOL for the airforce.

TLAM Strike 05-02-06 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XabbaRus
V/STOL JSF waste of time.

Since we are getting a big ship we should get the CTOL version for the RN and the V/STOL for the airforce.

Actualy the RN would need a STOBAR (Short Take Off But Arrested Recovery) or CATOBAR (Catapult Assisted Take Off But Arrested Recovery) for carrier work CTOL jet would tend to get wet... very wet... :know:

Why does the RAF use V/STOL? Is it for small air strips and such like the USMC trains to use?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.