Blair refuses to back Iran strike
 

"TONY Blair has told George Bush that Britain cannot offer military support to any strike on Iran, regardless of whether the move wins the backing of the international community, government sources claimed yesterday."

More: http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=577092006

Burned child fears the fire.

Why should he back it. Its not his war.

At last some thing good :D

Tony Blair’s next job in the E.U. and he dose not want to mess that one up dose he?

unless the UN backs the war against iran i really doubt the UK will get involved. and considering how much the US has been deliberatly pissing off the UN that aint never gonna happen.

Really? Britain traditionally works against the continental Europe's policy-making. And seeing where the EU is heading at, I even cannot blame them for that any longer. Not that Britain's stand during the cartoon-row was any more convincing and preferrable.

Latest info Skybird a very high position in the Environment section that's where are Mr Blair is going. Interesting comment you made Skybird, 80% of the running of the U.K. is now govern by Europe and Mr Blair has gone a long away to help them. To put it in a nut shell Tony Blair say's one thing like no but puts yes on the paper work. And he thinks we don't know what a fool that man is.

One day I come over to your island and stay there :cool:. Or Ireland, maybe. Said to have a wonderful landscape, and home of The Corrs, some of my favourite music. :) Last thing the EU needs is a Tony Blair in one of it's offices, I think. And last thing Britain needs is a Skybird in one of it's pubs :lol:

Your welcome any time Skybird and we have plenty of pubs for you. :D :D

Catch you all next weekend yes you heard me right very busy for the rest of the week. Enjoy yourself and please have some fun. :D :lol: :D

Are you certain?

If that should happen, then the englishmen will join the US in the war against Iran. but as I understand England is not interestet in a prestrike against Iran.

Markus

England, like much of the rest of Western Europe, may never have to experience sufferring from a single nuke. Sha'aria law is comming to a theater near you via creeping Islamization.

On the other hand, what you're saying is that the UK should risk being hit first anyway. Perhaps London or Machester is expendable after all.

It is no secret that Israel repeatedly has "leaked" it's intention that if it ever should fall it will take Europe with it. It also is no secret, as retired Israelis militaries repeatedly have indicated, that all European capitals and m ajor cities are in the crosshais of Israel'S nuclear forces. Maybe we should attack Israel, preemptively?

Concerning the Islamization, I must agree.

So by attacking Iran, this means that if nothing is done iran will fire that nuke on isreal or whoever. Isreal should have no fear of her enemies cos it aint gonna happen. Isreal will never be destroyed. And iran haven't said we going to wipe out the americans. So what is the friggin problem.

I say let iran talk out of there ass, and just keep an eye on them, but dont go and do some code red strike. America will only wake up the pitbulls :D