Return of the Zeppelin?
 

A sight that would make Count von Zeppelin proud. I'd prefer an 18 hour trip to the east coast in a really cool looking floating hotel over a standard flight any day. It'd also be amazing to see the sky filled with these:

http://img.timeinc.net/popsci/images...xHotel_485.jpg

The first prototype is scheduled to be completed in 2010. I'd be curious to know if they are still vulnerable to the same fate that befell the US Navy's zeppelin fleet in the 1920s and 30s. Destruction in high wind and storms.

http://www.popsci.com/popsci/whatsne...rop18=whatsnew

Re: Return of the Zeppelin?
 

Yeah - I saw this earlier today. Not sure I want this thing blotting out my sun!!!

-S

Am I the only one who thought this thread would be about a Led Zeppelin reunion?

A little something to mitigate the dissappointment mog. Zepp rulz! :rock:

http://www.purplemoon.com/Stickers/z...n-swansong.gif

YES!! ZEPPLIN ROCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: Return of the Zeppelin?
 

It wasn't high wind and storm that destroyed the Hindenburg, but because of a fire - probably caused by the Hindenburg being highly charged with static electricity when its mooring line touched the ground - and the resulting explosion of the highly inflammable hydrogen gas.
Nowadays the much safer helium gas is used.
:know:

Re: Return of the Zeppelin?
 

I guess I was thinking more in terms of the doomed American zeppelin fleet which consisted of one former German zeppelin and three American built ones and all used the safe helium gas. The Shenandoah, Macon, and Akron were all lost due to bad weather in the 1920s and 30s. The Los Angeles survived but she had her hair raising moments too. Here is a picture of her performing an 85 degree nose stand at her mooring mast in 1927 during a heavy windgust. The crew certainly had a memorable ride that day!

http://www.nlhs.com/images/la-album/la18.jpg

After losing three airships the United States Navy decided zepps weren't worth it and eventually scrapped the Los Angeles. The spectacular loss of the Hidenburg certainly seemed to seal the zeppelins fate as an aviation dead end....maybe. ;)

Actually, from looking at it I prefer that thing under water rather than in the skies. It would be a nice sub… the first commercial passenger/cargo sub.

At great speeds, it should reach Liverpool - New York in less than 72hours with over 3000 passengers in the quietest environment; all seated aircraft style and the Cargo would be immense.
http://www.nettouring.com/images/Public/SeaCanada.png

Now that would be using the room in good advantage. Up in the air, it needs most of the space for keeping that stupid gas mass to make it buoyant, and only a small portion is left for the people and cargo, not very efficient.:nope:

In addition, if that thing crashes and there are survivors, it would be somewhat funny to rescue people talking like little babies because of the helium gasped a few moments ago…:rotfl: :hmm:


And yes Led Zepp rocks…:rock:

How much is it going to cost us to stay on this luxury airship? :hmm:

Led Zep reunion. I guess you'd be needing a clarevoyant too?

What do you need to reunite Led Zeppelin?

Three more beers!

Okay, three hundred is a bit more realistic... :roll:

So.....what happens when it gets windy? :hmm:
its about as airodynamic as my arse

They stay docked, just like in the olden days. :down:

Does anyone recall the photo of the USS Los Angeles (ZR-3) standing end over end (approx. 85 degrees from horizontal)? I don't think passengers would approve.

EDIT: The photo:
http://www.nlhs.com/images/la-album/la18.jpg

Of course I recall the photo. I already posted it in this thread. Also posted my concerns about wind. People must be glance reading again. ;)

Oh and just for good measure.....Zepp rulz! :rock: