![]() |
Report on USS Greeneville - Ehime Maru collision
The NTSB has released its report on the USS Greeneville - Ehime Maru collision. I strongly recommend reading it, as it gives an excellent description of what goes on aboard a US nuclear sub while underway.
Link here: http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2005/MAB0501.htm |
a good read long but good
|
Required reading for the aTMA programmers at SCS!
No good solution going in a straight line! No good solution on too little data per leg! Just think how many people would still be alive if they had our autocrew.... |
:sunny: Thanks Bill - have just dld the pdf.
Read the 'unofficial repot' extracts back in August abd it will be very interesting to see the 'final'. |
Great, Bill, very interesting. :up: :up:
|
Re: Report on USS Greeneville - Ehime Maru collision
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Good read, lots of information in there. Don't remember that happening over 4 years ago. Man, time flies...
|
Quote:
|
But I dont understand. The black area is so small. The baffles are supposed to be 120 degree wide.
As far as I understand it, there is the black area, thats directly behind your sub (sonar blocked) and there are the baffles between 120 and 240 where signals are not blocked, but interfere with your own subs noises, therefore are not reliable or not shown at all). But Im prolly wrong here, or? |
The way baffles are modelled in DW is not at all realistic.
The baffles are WAY too small. Incidentially, this is corrected in the next version of the LWAMI Mod, 2.02, which will be released today or tomorrow morning. :yep: :) |
:lol: Amen. :up:
|
In the report they talk about the bearing rate as an indicator whether its a closing or opening contact.
Quote:
|
Once you have a solution in TMA, it is listed in the contact information window on the Nav Map.
|
First, thanx for the quick reply. :) I was looking for a bearing rate before TMA has been done, cause after all thats (bearing) all I have for the first 2 minutes, and even after that I prolly wont do a TMA with just 2 or 3 bearing rates, so a bearingrate indicator without having to have a solution would be really cool. But I guess there is none...? :-?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.