SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - Should RUb feature the Type XXI at all?

Page 1 of 3

Show 20 post(s) from this thread on one page

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)

- SHIII Mods Workshop (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=195)

- - Should RUb feature the Type XXI at all? (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=82363)

Beery

07-21-05 11:07 PM

Should RUb feature the Type XXI at all?

There has been a lot of talk about the Type XXI recently. As many people know, the Type XXI never actually fired a torpedo in anger in WW2, yet RUb features the Type XXI because I figured that it may have been ready a month earlier than it was. However, it's a very tenuous case. In RUb, the Type XXI exists in the game for a month, and players who want to command it have to wait about nine months for it to be made ready.

So I'm considering removing it from RUb altogether. So what do you folks think?

CCIP	07-21-05 11:28 PM

I think we should do what we can for the darn thing, provided it doesn't screw up the other subs and doesn't result in too much unwanted labour and half-assed workarounds.

I'm not against it or anything, but I suppose it all depends on the effort involved. I'd actually suggest that YOU personally don't spend much effort and headache (because that's what modding/testing is, in a nutshell) on it, and let those interested look for fixes and offer solutions. If they find them - I don't think it would be much problem for you to evaluate and implement them.

No need for heated debates and soured spirits like I've seen in the other threads. :-?

User 1834

07-22-05 12:10 AM

I would just like to quote a recent post by TteFAboB that, I think, is relevent here.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TteFAboB

...........We're talking about a game, or a simulator if you prefer, it is not a matter of being 100% realistic parallel universe or a complete fantasy dream. Your suggestions on the XXI availability are honest but think of "Flight Simulator", there are very, very few Boeing 747-XXX Pilots out there if compared to the massive masses of civil and smaller planes pilots, should Microsoft or modders work less hard to present a realistic 747-XXX only because it is a rare plane and if you wish to be a 747 pilot in real life your chances are very slim?

No, and especially because it is a rare, and more importantly, UNIQUE, aircraft it must be special and as realistic as possible to fly one in the simulator.

The same goes for the XXI, it is rare and special, "Silent Hunter III" is not only a realistic captain career simulator, it is open and flexible and allows you to play through your career as you wish, you can play as historically as possible and as unhistorically as possible or anywhere in between the two, you can choose historical boats but operate in unhistorical grids or rebase to unhistorical bases and so on, all with the same level of realism.

You find it negative to ask for a realistic XXI? Fiddling with the XXI could lead to new discoveries of the game mechanics which could lead to realism improvements on the other boats aswell, no modding is ever negative, if the in-game battery recharge operation on the XXI is "different" from the other boats it is an issue valid for investigation too.

vils	07-22-05 12:52 AM

...

i for one want to have something to look forward to, dont remove it!

instead, try to fix the radar if possible :)

snowsub

07-22-05 01:07 AM

I personally don't see the harm in keeping it, you don't have to use it if you don't want to but if it's taken away you don't even have a choice in the matter.

Would you get rid of insurance just cause you might never use it???

Duncan Idaho

07-22-05 01:29 AM

I'm all for keeping it, (though I'm not yet a RUB user).

I expect I will be someday soon.

Lastly, I just gotta say I really can't understand all the hostility the XXI causes. This place is so different from other boards...until one brings up the XXI, then all of a sudden the heat comes on. I was involved in another discussion on the subject here, and some joker just hotmouths at me and starts badmouthing my PC. That very same thread in just a few posts from there started finding the wanted fixes for this sub. If we'd have let that person shut us up, we wouldn't have some of the fixes we now have on the table.

Not to head off on a tangent, but there seems to be a small group of people here who need to cool down a bit about the XXI issue, (on both sides).

It's very hard to believe that this animosity's built up to the point that Beery's considering removing the sub. It's a darned shame. :nope:

Oesten

07-22-05 02:27 AM

The XXI is NOT a 'fantasy' sub, it really existed. Also, what isn't modelled in this sim is an ace U-boat commander's influence on Karl Donitz, pressing him to speed up introduction of the latest technology.

A captain can't perform miracles, but it's not beyond the realms of possibility that his efforts to influence BdU early on might have speeded up the introduction of the XXI by a few weeks.

I say:
Keep the XXI, but keep the limitations on it also, so the player can only start his first XXI patrol in April 1945. That means he should only have time for one patrol before the war ends.

The XXI is a wonderful in-game reward for those captains who struggle on frustrated as hell with their old deathtrap Type VII's and Type IX's throughout 1943 and 1944. I'm telling you, without the XXI to look forward to and motivate me, I wouldn't even bother playing a late war career, it's too frustrating.

Remember, the Type XXIII (the XXI's baby brother) isn't in the game, so compensating for that by allowing the XXI to make one war patrol isn't stretching realism too far.

If you want to eliminate a 'fantasy' sub from RUB 1.43, then eliminate the Type VIIC/42, which was never even built!

irishred

07-22-05 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oesten

If you want to eliminate a 'fantasy' sub from RUB 1.43, then eliminate the Type VIIC/42, which was never even built!

Hmm, is it not possible to take the VIIC/42 and use it to simulate another Type VII boat, like the A for 39-40 careers?

jason210

07-22-05 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snowsub

I personally don't see the harm in keeping it, you don't have to use it if you don't want to but if it's taken away you don't even have a choice in the matter.

Good answer.

Duli	07-22-05 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oesten

If you want to eliminate a 'fantasy' sub from RUB 1.43, then eliminate the Type VIIC/42, which was never even built!

First, Soviets build (finished) one, and second, VIIC/42 is already disabled in RuB1.42. :)

Oesten

07-22-05 05:56 AM

Ideally, I'd like the XXI replaced by the XXIII in SH3, but that's not possible for modders to do without an SDK since we can't make a 3D model of the XXIII and integrate it into the game.

I'd hoped that Ubi might build us an XXIII, but no such luck.

oRGy	07-22-05 07:24 AM

What Oesten says. No need to be a bloody killjoy over it.

Faamecanic

07-22-05 07:56 AM

Im all for keeping it, for several reasons.

1) It did go out on ONE war patrol... which thankfully for the allies, the war ended just before the XXI commander got to within 500m of 2 British crusiers and several destroyer escort. Later on that XXI commander ported with the SAME British cruisers to surrender. The XXI command spoke to the crusiers skipper and told them he was within 500m ... the Brits were astonished as they NEVER knew he was there. A testament to the "Uberness" of the XXI.

2) It was put in the game as a "reward" to the players that make it that far. Realistic? Not really. Fun to see what may have happend had a XXI entered the war in the waining months...YOU BET!

3) The same technology was used in the XXIII, a smaller derivative of the XXI with only 2 torps and 14 crew. It was VERY succesful in the Med... considering its small size. The technology was mature...it was the manufacturing (63 day from raw material to FULL SUB!!!) that hurt the XXI and delayed its entry.

larsen

07-22-05 10:39 AM

I'm not against keeping the XXI, but there should be limitations to simulate it's late availability and problems in getting them into service. Apparently the first ones were commissioned late June 1944 but there was no patrols done before march 45. So my guess is they should be available in July 1944 with a waiting time of 6-7 months...
As for the VIIC/42 it should not be available at all (none were ever completed).
I've seen others talking about the XXIII. Even if graphically it would not be right, couldn't it be modded as a new version of the type II ? After all type XXIIIs did see some action and were quoted in one of the books I have as 'the best submarine of the war'.

Beery

07-22-05 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by larsen

So my guess is they should be available in July 1944 with a waiting time of 6-7 months.....

That's almost exactly how they are modelled in RUb. They are first available in July 1944, but delays in testing and sea trials mean that the first time the boat is ready for action is March 1945. You get enough time for one patrol. In reality, some faults and damage sustained in final deep diving tests prevented Schnee's U-2511 (the first XXI to be operational) from leaving on its first war patrol in late March. If those tests had not damaged the boat, it might have been ready by the date it's available in RUb.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.

Page 1 of 3

Show 20 post(s) from this thread on one page