![]() |
P&O Ferries just made redundant 800 staff
Well it’s chaos in Dover as P&O suspends services not to mention other routes
So far they have stated 800 crew have been made redundant due to cost cutting https://t.co/mkV1Et5mOg |
The above link isn't working at my end Blair and it is being reported many crew are refusing to leave their cabins as a means of protest.
Belay that: Link now appears to be good :doh: |
Well, that's capitalism for ya. :nope:
|
^ That is 19th century capitalism. Are there no treaties?
"Escorting" them from their ships with handcuffs, seriously? :doh: And who is this announcer. |
A spokesperson for the company confirmed that the business is not “sustainable” in its current form.
“In its current state, P&O Ferries is not a viable business,” they said. “As part of the process we are starting today, we are providing 800 seafarers with immediate severance notices and will be compensating them for this lack of advance notice with enhanced compensation packages.” Police have intervened after sacked P&O workers blocked a road leading to the Port of Dover in response to the news. Dozens of employees who lost their jobs on Thursday stood on the road holding banners and flags saying “Stop the P&O jobs carve up”. It came after buses carrying agency workers hired to replace them appeared to arrive at the Kent port. Unions have told members to stage sit-ins onboard P&O vessels. RMT General Secretary Mick Lynch said: “We have instructed our members to remain onboard and are demanding our members across P&O’s UK operations are protected and that the Secretary of State intervenes to save UK seafarers from the dole queue.” Meanwhile, Mark Dickinson, general secretary of maritime union Nautilus International, said: “Be assured the full resources of Nautilus International stand ready to act in defence of our members. “We believe it is in our members’ best interests to stay onboard until further notice.” https://www.independent.co.uk/travel...-b2037991.html |
So what's to stop the company from ceasing their pay, confiscating their severances for damages and then filing a claim with their insurance company for stolen boats?
|
What it comes down to, is this : is the current business model viable, yes or no?
|
Quote:
|
According to the article in the Independent that Jim linked to, P&O said the current business model is "not sustainable".
Could be the truth on the economic reality. Could be greed by investors. I cannot judge it. One would need to see the internal numbers of theirs. Edit: I do not want to comment on or excuse the fashion in which employees got informed that "today is your last working day". If these reports are true, it is rude, no doubt. My initial question howerer - greed or economic need - remains valid, however. Germ media say P&O had 120 million Euros/100 million Pound in losses last year alone, that had tpo be comepsnated for by the mother company DB in Dubai. . |
Quote:
|
If DB paid out 270 million Pounds while getting only 100 million by P&O in profits, they made a loss of 160 million Pounds.
The wrath then should be directed at DB, not P&O. But opay, I am just curious and from a long distance. I only ju7mped in her because often I see demands that non-profitable companies shoulkd be bept floating as dead bodies in the water, socalled "zombie" companies, mand they have started tio brign all European eocnomy down because during the Corona time their share of the real eocnomy has grown to unsustainable levels. Non-competitive companies must leave the market - that also is part of ther market. There can be no (state-given) guarantee that every competitor or market participant turns out a winner. I do not know anything about the British ferry industry, however. But maybe international foreign shareholders and globalization is not that greta an idea at all...? I always was and still am very sceptical about it. Corona confirms me, and foreign investment locusts confirm me as well. |
My lad joined a ferry company a few years back and only lasted a week, he was seriously unimpressed.
|
Quote:
The reason i suspect they paid out during a major loss year is to reassure investors that their money was safe in the company. After all if you didn't pay out and investors sold stock it would create a run or fire sale on the company a bit like Lehman Brothers when their stock started to tank. Quote:
|
|
Replacement crews first day 'on the job' training.
https://i.postimg.cc/QtVn971X/row-well-and-live.jpg |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.