![]() |
Historical method intercept by hidrophone
I'd like to know
Historically in reality uboat commanders when the hydrophone had a contact what method used to intercept the target? Did they really use 3 or 4 Bering method? Or? what method did they use? Thanks :salute: |
Quote:
|
Great tutorial - thanks for posting!:yep:
|
Quote:
An easier method is to directly use blade count to determine speed in combination with a bearing / bearing rate plot and fitting the range to the lines of bearing based upon how long the distance between them needs to be for the given speed. Accurate enough for ranges we want to be at for our attack. And when visibility sucks, you can race to an attack position on the surface before submerging again to pick the target up on the hydros. Much easier than trying to guess a locus point for a future theoretical bearing. |
Quote:
Quote:
That's what I think too I do not think there was a formula or a particular method Hydrophones were used to "have an idea" of the situation until the target was visible and only then did the hunt begin |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.