It was only a matter of time....
 

Heh heh. :up:

Care to add SUBROC, ASTOR (or even an ASTOR w/conventional warhead)?

The Soviets had a full range of nuclear depth bombs, torpedoes, ASM's, SSM's, sub and ship launched rockets, atomic demolitions for Naval Spetsnaz, etc.

Yours, Mike

Will I still have to fire 10 of them get a mission success?

LOL. I imagine firing 1 would be a mission failure, owing to the whole planetary destruction angle...

That hill outside Murmansk is SO dead.

Nah, I altered the damage ratio from 845 to 8500. :03:

It'd be a fairly large escalation...

Only someone called DetCord could come up with something like this:03:

I can imagine the conversation with WEPS
What's the explosive power of these things?
845 sir
Hmm, gonna need more
Much more

We had nuke's in the very low kiloton range (37 tons and up), mainly artillery fired atomic projectiles. Davy Crockett was about 20 tons. Not my specialty, I worked on strategic and tactical bombs (not to mention explosives and demolitions). Det cord is your friend.

Any one thought of implementing the NT-37 torpedo? It was fielded in 1975, range 19,000 yds, speed 32 knots, warhead 330 lbs HBX. Mk 48's are fine for the 1984 campaign, but I like a little bit of a challenge (lol).

Yours, Mike

I lol'ed at that!