Quote:
Originally Posted by Schroeder
(Post 2438253)
I'm a minority with all three correct...:doh:
I mean really guys, 1 and 2 aren't that hard even if you don't understand the whole math behind it and number three is logical too.
|
Empirical, not logical. :03:
:O:
Market theories seek to sound logical, but reality is more complex and dynamically vibrant. If market reality were logical indeed, then nothing would speak against implementing planned economy. That planned economies always fail - what does this tell us about the logic in market reality? At least that market reality is harder to predict than logic would imply - and so it cnanot be logical.
So question three indeed is simply about knowing it, or not knowing it. But I would have assumed that with the media hype about stock reports and all the hyper-aspiration around it, this simple empirical finding by now has made the round and is common "knowledge", like the basic multiplication table.
I indeed think that instead of having anti-agression seminars at schools and courses in creative exprssisve dancing, their should be courses run on basic of economics and money theory. And the curriculae for these should not be set up by bankers, mainstream economics or political parties, all of which would have an interest in brainwashing the kids to believe in what has brought us into the money crisis and debts crisis and state crisis that we now are in. Economic education that is streamlined according to the wishes of the state's and banks' actors, necessarily just will grease and lubricate the highway into disaster.
And I was not joking. Money questions arise from almost all issues that voters usuallyvote on qhen they are called to generla elections, not specifically, but inherently. If people cannot even answer these most simple and profound questions correctly, what good can come from letting them vote? Any good there comes from it, only can be due to total random chance - or the goddess of fate intervening in our favour.
There is a reason why a pilot of a transatlantic flight does not negotiate with the passengers what stesp and proedures he will do next. Our political-economical problem today is that we mostly allow train drivers to fly our airliners.
Which may have something to do that we allow people to vote who cannot evewn fiogure out those three simple, basic, questions above.
I remind again that originally, democracy is a
feudal form of government, and excludes most of the people from taking part: Greece, ancient era.
Now, the next American elections upcomign this autumn will teach us a lesson on the underlying problem I point at anyway - no matter the outcome. The constellation there is now - "either Clinton or Trump" - perfectly illustrates that something very profound runs dramatically wrong.