SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   ME262 Project (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=221963)

fireftr18 09-17-15 08:16 PM

ME262 Project
 
According to the site, it's the only flyable ME262.
Pretty sweet.
https://www.warhistoryonline.com/mil...e=facebook.com

August 09-17-15 09:44 PM

:salute:

Eichhörnchen 09-18-15 04:16 AM

The flying shots look like something out of a modern flight sim... good post:up:

Sailor Steve 09-18-15 12:13 PM

"It felt as though angels were pushing".
Generalleutnant Adolf Galland, on his first flight in the Messerschmitt 262, May 1943

Aktungbby 09-18-15 12:34 PM

SCHWALBIBBY!
 
Quote:

near-exact reproductions of several versions of the Me 262
https://www.warhistoryonline.com/wp-...75-640x289.jpgI find this thread too hard to 'swallow'!:O: I'd imagine the 'near' exact has to do with today's superior metallurgical science which readily adapts, makes more reliable and improves the Jumo 004's 1940's theory BIGTIME:up:

Eichhörnchen 09-18-15 01:04 PM

I noticed a small nav light flashing beneath the fuselage as it took off, so small but necessary concessions like that to modern regulations probably also account for the "near exact" bit

CaptainHaplo 09-18-15 01:31 PM

Can I get mine with the 4 Mk 108 30mm cannons mounted in the nose?

Catfish 09-18-15 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainHaplo (Post 2345552)
Can I get mine with the 4 Mk 108 30mm cannons mounted in the nose?

Why not take the Mauser 50 mm MK 214A (Maschinenkanone) to give you this extra Punch :hmm2:


http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y17...psuyeikcg8.jpg


Thanks fireftr18 for the video, learned something new about it :)
I always believed the Heinkel jet was the better design, and the Jumo 04 a better engine than the BMW 003. But then i'm biased, my father worked at the Junkers aeroplane works back then :03:

Schroeder 09-18-15 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aktungbby (Post 2345540)
I find this thread too hard to 'swallow'!:O: I'd imagine the 'near' exact has to do with today's superior metallurgical science which readily adapts, makes more reliable and improves the Jumo 004's 1940's theory BIGTIME:up:

It would be a bit dangerous and expensive to mount the original engines. They were EXTREMELY touchy to throttle changes (liked to catch fire or stall) and had a service life of just 25 hours IIRC.

Aktungbby 09-18-15 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Catfish (Post 2345564)
Why not take the Mauser 50 mm MK 214A (Maschinenkanone) to give you this extra Punch :hmm2:


http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y17...psuyeikcg8.jpg


Thanks fireftr18 for the video, learned something new about it :)
I always believed the Heinkel jet was the better design, and the Jumo 04 a better engine than the BMW 003. But then i'm biased, my father worked at the Junkers aeroplane works back then :03:

Anschließend wurde der Prototyp dem Jagdverband 44 übergeben, wo die Maschine von Major Wilhelm Herget geflogen wurde. Beim einzigen Einsatz dieser Me 262 A-1a/U4 am 16. April 1945 gegen alliierte Bomber versagte die Bordkanone jedoch aufgrund einer Ladehemmung. http://www.deutscheluftwaffe.de/archiv/Dokumente/ABC/m/MK%20214/MK%20214%20%20Maschinenkanone.htm
:wah:
http://www.deutscheluftwaffe.de/arch...0002%20500.jpg The other experiment variant(2) carried the BK-5 50mm gun...As installed in the Me 262, the cannon was found to be prone to jamming, and if fired at night the BK 5's muzzle flash tended to temporarily blind the pilot's night vision.http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircr...schwalbe_8.jpg The standard 4 30mm cannon, while 'lethal on paper' had problems with jamming during maneuvering and low muzzle velocity made accuracy beyond 600 meters problematic and useless for straffing.

Commander Wallace 09-19-15 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fireftr18 (Post 2345433)
According to the site, it's the only flyable ME262.
Pretty sweet.
https://www.warhistoryonline.com/mil...e=facebook.com

Awesome. From what I have seen, the reproduction me-262's being built now look like the original but feature advanced metallurgy and construction . The video mentions new GE engines and they can also be had with the Pratt and Whitney engines version.

Great video. Thanks for posting.

GT182 09-19-15 06:15 PM

As far as I know the Collings Foundation has the only flying Me-262 in the USA as of this moment. It has the J85 engine in it, and it is a B-1c model.

http://www.collingsfoundation.org/ai...s/?tab=tab-two Then click on Messerschmitt ME-262.

And it is one of the 262s that were reproduced.. White 1 as far as I know and is based in Houston Texas. Bought from a Texas Judge's estate. Due to it's 300 mile range it doesn't go very far from home. It's the "one aircraft" that I was hoping to have a ride in if it was out on the "Wings of Freedom Tour". But that won't happen either. It is set up to fly with the single seat canopy or the dual seat canopy of a trainer. It is flyable from the rear seat.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.