SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   39 Historic Photos in Colour (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=216427)

Tango589 10-24-14 12:58 PM
39 Historic Photos in Colour
 
I couldn't find if these have been posted before, so I thought 'what the hell' just because they are supremely awe inspiring!

http://www.buzzfeed.com/nicholaswray/historic-photos

Aktungbby 10-24-14 01:08 PM
I wonder what they were laughing about!? Great pics!http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BudirBLIYAA7uGm.jpg

Tango589 10-24-14 01:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aktungbby (Post 2254956)
I wonder what they were laughing about!? Great pics!http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BudirBLIYAA7uGm.jpg
They're laughing about how amusing it'll be to win the war and force all decent British folks to wear Lederhosen!

Also, #30: PUPPIES FTW!

Jimbuna 10-25-14 07:15 AM
Whilst not originally taken in colour but one of my favourites.

Titanic
http://s30.postimg.org/59w5w5msh/image.jpg

Mr Quatro 10-25-14 01:37 PM
Titanic II is scheduled to sail in 2016: http://www.titanic-ii.com/


http://www.titanic-ii.com/sites/defa...x720_00011.jpg

Platapus 10-25-14 02:25 PM
To pick a nit, because that's the type of pompous prick I am.. There is a difference between a color photograph and a colorized photograph. I suspect that all of the 39 photographs in that article are colorized not color photographs.

vanjast 10-25-14 04:18 PM
That is not Winston Churchill !!
:hmmm:

Tango589 10-25-14 04:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Platapus (Post 2255234)
To pick a nit, because that's the type of pompous prick I am.. There is a difference between a color photograph and a colorized photograph. I suspect that all of the 39 photographs in that article are colorized not color photographs.
You are right on both accounts:
  1. You are a pompous prick.:O:
  2. The photos are colourized, not colour.

Rhodes 10-25-14 06:08 PM
Not all the pictures are colourized, IMO!

fireftr18 10-25-14 07:34 PM
How about Jane Mansfield? :O:

Tango589 10-26-14 05:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanjast (Post 2255264)
That is not Winston Churchill !!
:hmmm:
Maybe not, he did have a stand-in as well.:hmmm:

Jimbuna 10-26-14 06:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhodes (Post 2255279)
Not all the pictures are colourized, IMO!
The Rocks of Andromeda, Jaffa, and transports laden with war supplies headed out to sea in 1918. This image was taken using the Paget process, an early experiment in color photography.
http://s14.postimg.org/95efyrnkx/image.jpg

Rhodes 10-26-14 10:16 AM
^ Autochrome pre-dates that photo, as one of the first commercial color process.

I was referencing to the photos in the article, some were taken in color (negative or positive) film. Others were colourized. The samurai ones, possibly taken by Beato, were colourized, he did that to his photos.

Jimbuna 10-26-14 10:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhodes (Post 2255499)
^ Autochrome pre-dates that photo, as one of the first commercial color process.

I was referencing to the photos in the article, some were taken in color (negative or positive) film. Others were colourized. The samurai ones, possibly taken by Beato, were colourized, he did that to his photos.
Oh yeah I knew what you meant...my intention was to post one that hadn't been 'colourized'.

Rhodes 10-26-14 05:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbuna (Post 2255524)
Oh yeah I knew what you meant...my intention was to post one that hadn't been 'colourized'.
Yes, I know. But then again, early colour processes were additive, so every color picture was "colourized"! :know:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.