A question about an online newspaper
 

Facebook placed a side on my wall, ´cause they thought that it would interest me. in 99 % I ignore thise suggestions. Not this time, I want to know what kind of news this was

The newspaper is called Red Flag

and here is what it says on their main page

"Aggregating the news that mainstream media distort and ignore"

Yesterday they had an article about some egyptian that had some info, which could get obama arrested.

Hello- Do you really thing that mainstream media such as CNN, Foxnews a.s.o would ignore such an important news?

Thinking of remove my "like" from this newspaper- Think it's one of these phoney/conspiracy-like newspaper.

Here's some of the news from that page

http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines...trike-on-syria

Edit: found the article about this Obama thing

http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines...nts-and-proofs


Markus

Of course they would ignore it. They ignored the two-headed dog-boy, didn't they?

I read the article. Lots of "I know somebody who has information." When they show the actual proof, then it will be news.

Why would you 'like' a source like that in the first place?

Curious in the first place that's why I "like" the page.

Ah. I normally only 'Like' things that I like. :sunny:

Just as I only 'Friend' people who are actually friends. That's funny, because the handful of people I consider true friends here aren't on my 'Friends' list.

It looks like Red Flag is an news opinion site. If you are interested in reading other people's opinions about stuff, sites like this are valuable.

However, if you are truly looking for a new source that reports different stories or stories not always covered in depth by the majors, you need to either go to local/regional news sources or international news sources.

When I really want to get a full spectrum of news reporting, I read not only domestic stories but stories in the various international news services/papers.

If you really want to understand stuff, you can't limit your research to only domestic sources. :yep:

Thank you so much for your advice. :up:

Markus

The first link reads almost word for word the same as an article on MSN.com regarding the pointy things being moved into position near Syria.

The second link was news to me but, take it with a grain of salt. It's nothing more than here say and he said she said gossip. If somebody has concrete evidence of some conspiracy, they should let someone in the legislative branch know about it. Along with every mainstream news agency in the free world. That way, it can't be quietly swept under a rug. Or can it?:shifty::hmmm:

The problem is that people are so mind-numbingly gullible and too lazy to actually think for themselves so they let whatever they read on the internet tell them what to think.

As steve pointed out, the article has no reliable sources, farfetched information, and heavy bias. Yet a disturbing number of people would probably believe it. I remember a recent episode of Brain Games where a guy dressed in a suit being followed by a camera crew would go around and tell people the most ridiculous fake news, claiming to be a reporter, and those people would buy into wholesale.

Its truly, deeply depressing to come to the realization that if people weren't such sheep, so EASILY manipulated into ideas, that the world would be an entirely different place. "Individuals are intelligent; people are stupid". People get so tribalistic, so heavily brainwashed, that the true motives of the people aren't being implemented. Mob mentality is one of the worst things to plague humanity, as it prevents people from using their judgement, intuition, logic, and morals to make rational decisions; instead they jump on a bandwagon and believe whatever they're told to believe. :nope:

I'm wondering if they took the name or if there is any connection with a German communist newspaper created on 9 November 1918 by Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg :hmm2:

I'm familier with "Red Flag." It uses the age old propaganda technique of showing real, verifiable news that every other news agency shows intermixed with false news. They hope people read it and accept the false news as true. After all, there are true news stories in there. I don't trust any news story unless I am able to trace it back to a reliable source. Then I'm still cautious about it because the story itself is probably biased anyway.

Protip: Always click on About Us links. This one takes you to another link called Frequently Asked Questions.

http://www.redflagnews.com/faqs

Some highlights:


Let's see. "We don't trust nobody". "Sheeple". "Informed" used as codespeak. "Artful presentation". Tea Party Movement. More codespeak. Yes, you can assume this is bunk, and can do so rather quickly. Reading is your friend.

"high-information voters"