SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Define an "assault weapon" (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=200787)

Neptunus Rex 12-21-12 01:34 PM

Define an "assault weapon"
 
One that keeps firing when the trigger is held until ammo runs out?

One that has a magazine?

One that holds more than a single round?

One that looks like a "military" style weapon?

Armistead 12-21-12 01:38 PM

Last definition that Clinton signed.

Semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines and two or more of the following:Semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines and two or more of the following:
  • Magazine that attaches outside the pistol grip
  • Threaded barrel to attach barrel extender, flash suppressor, handgrip, or suppressor
  • Barrel shroud that can be used as a hand-hold
  • Unloaded weight of 50 oz (1.4 kg) or more
  • A semi-automatic version of a fully automatic firearm.
Semi-automatic shotguns with two or more of the following:
  • Folding or telescoping stock
  • Pistol grip
  • Fixed capacity of more than 5 rounds
  • Detachable magazine.
Notice this list excludes most of the guns people today are referring to as assault weapons.

soopaman2 12-21-12 01:42 PM

Something a patriot would use.

CCIP 12-21-12 01:44 PM

I always thought of an assault weapons (or at least ARs) as something that fires a rifle- or carbine-sized round from a fairly compact package that does not require frequent reloading.

soopaman2 12-21-12 01:48 PM

Fully automatic rifle round firing weapon. (being serious this time)

I am still searching for a negative agenda for this thread, or if the OP is as disgusted by the term "assault rifle" as I am?:06: Just wondering, alot of anti gun nuts abound, when bad crap happens, so I am naturally on guard.

As liberal as I am, I am conservative on guns. ;)

Takeda Shingen 12-21-12 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2 (Post 1980624)
I am still searching for an agenda for this thread, or if the OP is as disgusted by the term "assault rifle" as I am?:06:

Looks like you already brought one with your previous response, so I wouldn't say that it matters.

nikimcbee 12-21-12 02:05 PM

Quote:

Fully automatic rifle round firing weapon. (being serious this time)
Those have been illegal since the 30s. Se we can ban them again.:haha:

Neptunus Rex 12-21-12 02:16 PM

There is no "hidden" agenda. This is the crux of the whole issue, what is an assault weapon. Not looking for the legal definition, but perception, because that is what drives opinion.

There are no gotcha's here.

soopaman2 12-21-12 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Takeda Shingen (Post 1980628)
Looks like you already brought one with your previous response, so I wouldn't say that it matters.

I was asking the OP to clarify, my troll detector rang a little bit.

My pro-gun stance has nothing to do with my interest in the purpose of this thread, considering all the other gun threads we have. I just want to know if I am responding to a troll, or a legit question.

I bought nothing daimyo-sama.

I was simply trying to feel out if this was pro or anti guns. So I could debate it properly.

Neptunus Rex 12-21-12 02:28 PM

For the record, I am pro-gun, 2nd amendment and I have no interest in pile driving anyone that doesn't agree with me.

Takeda Shingen 12-21-12 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2 (Post 1980654)
I was asking the OP to clarify, my troll detector rang a little bit.

My pro-gun stance has nothing to do with my interest in the purpose of this thread, considering all the other gun threads we have. I just want to know if I am responding to a troll, or a legit question.

I bought nothing daimyo-sama.

I was simply trying to feel out if this was pro or anti guns. So I could debate it properly.

Oh come on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2
Something a patriot would use.

It's fine if you feel that way, but that reeks of an agenda, which you accused the OP of.

And enough with the daimyo-sama stuff.

soopaman2 12-21-12 02:34 PM

If there was an agenda on the OPs part, I hold no hostility.

I been nice, your the one attacking me Takeda.

I just want to know the op's intentions.

Before I accuse him of passive aggresiveness.

I am direct, I throw my views out there, despite peoples opinions on it.

I want the OP to do the same, before I invest any time arguing or agreeing with it.

As of so far, I been arguing with you Takeda, for no reason, as nothing has been clarified to me, just you attacking me, for asking for more info.

Takeda Shingen 12-21-12 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2 (Post 1980669)
If there was an agenda on the OPs part, I hold no hostility.

I been nice, your the one attacking me Takeda.

I just want to know the op's intentions.

Before I accuse him of passive aggresiveness.

I am direct, I throw my views out there, despite peoples opinions on it.

I want the OP to do the same, before I invest any time arguing or agreeing with it.

As of so far, I been arguing with you Takeda, for no reason, as nothing has been clarified to me, just you attacking me, for asking for more info.

Attacking you and attacking your point are different things. You need to distinguish between the two. I also explained that you brought an agenda with your patriot comment just as you accused Neptunus Rex of doing, which is certainly not fair to him, as the tone of his post was far more neutral than your's. You can backpedal if you want, but they are your words, not mine, not his.

As far as I can tell, he doesn't have an agenda, and didn't from the very first post. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

soopaman2 12-21-12 02:47 PM

Thanks Neptunus Rex.

I meant no hostility, nor meant to judge you on views pro or con to my beliefs.


Live and love in peace Neptunus Rex.:salute:

You too Daimyo. I am fulfilled :)

Takeda Shingen 12-21-12 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soopaman2 (Post 1980684)
You too Daimyo. I am fulfilled :)

Again, my friends here call me Tak. You can call me Takeda.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.